| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 811 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
Edited by Spencerj72 12/29/2021 04:40 am
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34418 Posts |
@spen, no need for clickbait titles. Rather please keep them explanatory and always include the date, mint, and denomination. Thx.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96467 Posts |
Please, no screen shots of your coins,
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
My bad on forgetting to include denomination mint and date I'll take that into consideration for next time. Now as to your other comments there is no clickbait and for you to say there is offensive to me it's a simple question. Matter of fact it is a question that has yet to be answered as for the second part I almost didn't ask it for the simple fact that every time I have asked it I have been made to feel as though I should heave already known the answer. If any part of your comments were aimed at the warning I placed before the question this was done due to my last post having subpar photos to which I promised form here on out I would place a warning for those who had sensitive eyes. Now if you would please post a comment I can use to better understand what it is I'm looking at it would be appreciated.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I have said many times before...Mike Diamond says no OMM's after 1955. Please no screen shots anymore...thanks. John1 
Edited by John1 12/29/2021 05:46 am
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
Who on here can afford to buy me a computer or other means to post photos? Let you in on a secret I'm disabled and can't afford one on the check I'm sent so if you can't do it for me or offer up a way I can for myself then please just pass on my post upon seeing the first photo that's what the warning is there for.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
Now the. If we can get pass all of that can any of you actually say what it is that I'm seeing?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Going with those pics,a circulation damaged mint mark. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
This is an OMM you can verify on Wexlers site it's to a 1980 FS-01-1980D-501 (034.1),
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
Excuse me it's been pulled from files But there is a 1956 D/S
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
1959,1960,1968 these are years identified by PCGS so I'm unsure where 1955 was the last year for omm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
There are two purported OMM's among 1956, one is actually a misplaced S mint mark on a 1956-D cent...however, these have been questioned. That is a quote from Mike Diamond. How are you posting photos if you have no computer? With a cell phone? If so,you can buy something like this (not recommending seller) https://www.ebay.com/itm/2654272062...BFBM5OiY3sBfThey also have some on Amazon. John1 
Edited by John1 12/29/2021 08:46 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: 1959,1960,1968 these are years identified by PCGS so I'm unsure where 1955 was the last year for omm Please provide links. Also please provide link to This is an OMM you can verify on Wexlers site it's to a 1980 FS-01-1980D-501 (034.1), John1 
Edited by John1 12/29/2021 07:12 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Just noticed you passed the 50 post count milestone...contest time  John1 
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 811 |
|