| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,344 |
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
Was looking through a coin roll and came across this 1959-D cent that seems to be delaminated on the reverse. Tried to get a clear side view but my clumsy hands kept that from happening. I hope these are clear enough to see.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
Looks like a nice lamination to me, I think delamination is when the lamination peel comes off during the striking process but other can confirm. I'd say worth an acetone bath and 2×2. Also 
Edited by Wrekkdd 02/16/2022 1:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3003 Posts |
Therealbb  to the CCF!!! holy smokes!  I like it. what ever it is i would be the stupid one trying to pull up on it like it was a scab.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Thought I would add that this coin does weigh 3.1 grams
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
Weight seems normal. A lamination peel shouldn't effect weight because the metal is still on the coin, a delamination the coin will be under Weight depending the size of the peel that was removed. Definitely don't try and peel it off.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
That is a nice delamination!! Quote: I think delamination is when the lamination peel comes off during the striking process but other can confirm I think of it in general terms. It could be worded as "a delamination on the surface" or "a lamination error". I notice people on this forum usually use lamination. I am used to using delamination because that is what happens on a skateboard when the different layers of wood split. Maybe there is a specific way to use those terms with numismatics?
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 . Nice find. Please properly crop and rotate photos/coins before posting...thanks. John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97320 Posts |
oh WOW, that is a very nice one.... lucky you..
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97320 Posts |
 too
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19205 Posts |
Excellent! A keeper for sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
Quote:
I think of it in general terms. It could be worded as "a delamination on the surface" or "a lamination error". I notice people on this forum usually use lamination. I am used to using delamination because that is what happens on a skateboard when the different layers of wood split. Maybe there is a specific way to use those terms with numismatics? In not sure exactly what technical terms are used but that's just from what I have read on this sidlte and multiple other. PCGS refers to laminations that are attached as a lamination error, if it's not attached it's a detached lamination error(or delamination) if the lamination was peeled off its usually noticable, where as a lamination the was retained after the strike, or removed has a name of its own. I'm still learning the lingo for some of these errors lol. http://goccf.com/t/136679
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1721 Posts |
It looks like a secret compartment. Super nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
This coins majority of the people will say DELAM. In fact it is the effect of aging coin (metal). If you look to the marks of circulation, the composition of the planchet will give the answer. This do not happened in the process of minting, it is post mint due to the metal aging.
Edited by silviosi 02/16/2022 6:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3328 Posts |
Quote: This coins majority of the people will say DELAM. In fact it is the effect of aging coin (metal). If you look to the marks of circulation, the composition of the planchet will give the answer. Tis do not happened in the process of minting, it is post mint. I know lamination errors usually happen after the coin was minted but though it was due to impurities in the metals causing issues with them binding. If this is the case then the error happens post mint but was not noticable untill the aging process caused the lamination to start splitting from the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Correct theory. But the form you has on your coins come from aging and forces applied and not from structure of the material. Face to face we can debate this hours because it is a very interesting point of the collecting.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Thank you to you all for your insights. I'll work on my cropping and rotating image abilities for the future. I will be taking this to our next coin club meeting here in Cleveland, nonetheless, it's now in a 2x2 and will be kept.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,344 |