As you've already figured out, most VAM identification centers on the particular characteristic which most clearly defines the VAM - in the case of your VAM-4, the repunched 1. In a lot of cases, supporting data like date placement and accompanying die cracks just doesn't get recorded.
My guess is, the location of the date just hasn't been recorded for this one. This lack of additional data is a source of irritation to me sometimes, but then I consider how many VAM's there are....
Looks to me that both are near dates. One is low and the other in normal position as far as height. I see a crack on the one of the listed VAM 4 and another fine crack coming off the neck on it. Maybe you already figured that in. Maybe the one in question is the normal date for that year. ? (near date)
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use