| Author |
Replies: 29 / Views: 2,746 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
Quote: numismatic student, I think you've made your point. Apparently not. Quote: It's semantics.
There is a difference between "the oldest one cent coin" and "the oldest coin which was valued at one cent" If that is the case, is the coin below "the oldest U.S. quarter coin" or "the oldest coin valued at one quarter?" My answer is both. There is no difference in these two statements.  There is also a pattern quarter dated 1792 which also doesn't have any denomination stated on the coin. Is the coin below then "the oldest U.S. quarter coin" or "the oldest coin valued at one quarter?" Likely the oldest U.S. quarter pattern coin. Again, the semantic quibble makes no difference.  In my opinion, a quarter is a quarter regardless of whether it carries a denomination on the coin as long as it was intended to be a quarter. Logically then, the Fugio is the first cent regardless of whether it carries an impressed denomination within the design.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I do not consider the Fugio cent to be the "oldest US cent" because it is not explicitly denominated as a cent. That's my opinion.
Unless OP is willing to clarify what precisely is meant by the question -- valued at a cent, or denominated as a cent, or both? -- there is no "right" answer.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
Do you consider the 1796 quarter the oldest US quarter minted for circulation? That quarter is also not denominated as a quarter. By your logic, that quarter should not be the oldest US quarter.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16845 Posts |
Back when the Fugio cent was made, it was common for coins, both base-metal and precious-metal, to not bear a denomination. That way, the government issuing the coin could easily change the face value of the coin if deemed necessary, simply by legislating that Fugio cents would now be worth 2 cents (for example). Of course, this never actually happened to any US coin; the Fugio cent was valued at one cent for its entire history as a circulating coin. Therefore I see no problem with calling it "The Oldest US Cent": it was tariffed at one cent as per legislation of Congress, it was issued by a government calling itself "The United States", and it was the first such coin. There is a separate though related debate (recently played out here on the forum and elsewhere) as to whether or not the Fugio Cent qualifies as "Federal coinage" or not. This is in light of PCGS recently reclassifying Fugio Cents from "Colonial" to "Federal".
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
@ AmericanCoinMan , I bet you never thought your so-called simple question would get so much attention by our members  .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I'll cede the point. The logic is sound.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Edited by paralyse 03/23/2022 4:37 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
They are all just pennies to me. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
I think the pre-denomination early U.S. coinage will be collected and prized due to this unusual feature, not just because it was early. As scholarship of this period becomes more socialized I think it will be an important grouping. I am thinking that a type set of pre-denomination U.S. coinage would be greatly interesting.
Within this grouping, there will also be added importance for the subgroup of pre-denomination coinage that was issued by our new nation prior to the establishment to the Mint. In particular, those that were produced by an act of Congress, in other words, officially commissioned by our national government.
Many of these issues were lumped together with more crude colonials for a long time, which reflected more parochial ideas. These pre-U.S. Mint issues are a melding of many diverse ideas that became the United States of America.
Sure there are collectors with highly specialized knowledge, many of them in CCF, but I think that a wider collecting public will become more steeped in how our nation's coinage came to be. Our coinage was born out of the many conversations and values that shaped our free way of life.
The Fugios will be an important part of this small, prized grouping, struck at a critical time in the formation of our nation. I think that when young people realize the hollowness of video games and they mature, they will become more interested in some of those things that we prize today.
I am always astounded by the inquisitive and thoughtful quality of the folks that I run into in this forum.
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com
Edited by numismatic student 03/23/2022 6:18 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
Quote: They are all just pennies to me.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1849 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Some really nice pre-federals there Germanicvs (as usual). I am in the Fugio Cent camp also. I can't call the pre-federals official because they weren't official United States issues as the U.S. wasn't yet officially an entity.
So the Fugio is first, followed by the pattern 1792 Birch cent and Silver centered cents next the 1793 chain cent.
Lots of "so-called" and named pennies or cents in the early issues like the Albany Church Penny of 1790, and what about the very early 1737 Higley coppers? "Value me as you please" likely to be half pence or 1/2 pennies.
This is why I love the Colonial issues so much to study and learn, even 260+ years later.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
Quote: I solved the issue for myself by having examples of each in my collection Looking good! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
Nice coverage of all bases G-man. 
IN NECESSARIIS UNITAS - IN DUBIIS LIBERTAS - IN OMNIBUS CARITAS THE MAN IN THE ARENA, Theodore Roosevelt at the Sorbonne Paris on April 23, 1910: " It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." My coin website: https://fairfaxcoins.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Going over some older videos I have on a back up hard drive, I came across this really fascinating and very pertinent to this discussion on early American cents. Given by John Kraljevich at the 2005 EAC Connvention worth a watch if you are interested in early coinage. John covers what coins circulated here in America alongside large cents vs/ stuff that just didn't yet is often sold as American circulating colonial coinage. Good stuff as always by one of our generations most knowledgeable numismatists. https://archive.org/details/EAC0501...olonialCoins
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 2,746 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.6 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|