| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 1,111 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
What attribution number do you think it is and way too many photos.Bobby does not like that. John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19157 Posts |
Hesitant to ask for new photos; however, suggest posting full, large and shart images of the obverse and reverse--just two photos (to go along with those above).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
No more pictures. No doubling of any sort. There is only one DDO for this year, the big one. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@SpencerJ: I do not have in the hand your coin. Yes are some DD's on 1958 without to be publish. To be honest, you take nice photos but far to close to be able to come at a conclusion. Try take photos without so much focus.. In your case an X20 will be enough. @ Cujohn: you go just by what was publish. Sorry you are wrong. Manny non publish varieties and errors are in collections and will be never publish. Those trading are done on close doors and the others do not have access to, Sorry man to tell you but I give gift an 1958 date DDO and an RPM of 1958 to two of the most recognized specialists, and just because they argument with me that do not exist and because those things for me has no value. Edited by silviosi
03/23/2022 11:58 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
163 Posts |
To everyone I must say I'm sorry for the images being to close and clear, it's just that I've had nothing but complaints about my imaging and have heard every time that it isn't a DDO because it can't be seen. As for this coin I used imaging of the only one to go to auction for comparison I found it to be a little more accurate that the other stock photos. Going by the auction house images I feel they are spot on as far as the spread and any other marks to be found. It was my hope that someone here had similar images for them to compare to. Again thanks everyone |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The tops of Liberty are showing Machine Doubling. This is caused by the machine. A doubled die has the doubling on the dies and can also suffer from Machine Doubling. But the machine doesn't make a doubled die, the die does. The big one is huge:  You don't to look that close to see this DDO. There are only three known 1958 DDO examples. Your is not one of them. |
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
Ok Coop this is a teaching moment for you and a learning moment for me. Let start by explaining why your comment have only confused me further. If I'm to understand what you just said the top of liberty are machine doubled, and in the presence of said Machine Doubling all other DD become null and void? If that's true there's gonna be some angry collectors when they find out lol. Seriously though so I understand are you saying that the top of liberty is machine doubled so therefor the remaining devices are to be considered Machine Doubling? I'm confused, to say the least. This logic makes no sense to me, what I heard my self try and reason is white is,white, Black is Black, mix one part with the other you get Red unless you need. Red then it becomes yellow. The way I understand it a die is doubled during it creation where as a machine does the other 2 completely separate processes, so how would one influence the others existence? A DD is A DD correct? Even in the presence of machine. Ok so I think I have it maybe, but wait what rotation was the the 1958 subject to I only ask because all devices are doubled in the same direction they show the separation notching splitting and every other description of a true DD, on top of that they all show the same degree of separation as the coin in question ie the big one. So no again I'm still just as confused, please explain this to me. |
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
163 Posts |
Sorry about any attitude from those last couple post Coop was having a bad nay
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,111 |
|
Posted 03/23/2022 3:34 pm
