| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,151 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
It is a normal 1956, with a strike of the very age Die. To grad? when you state was clean? NO do not spend the money for nothing. If was Type B, maybe yes. But varieties clean will be 25% of the normal.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
Thank you for the response, to clarify I am wondering your thoughts on the condition of this year quarter and if it looks as if it might have been cleaned in the past. To me (the untrained eye) it sends to be in decent condition.
Thanks again
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I will go 63 to 64. the Observe drop more then the Reverse. I like the X on the Reverse. was newer Die.
Edited by silviosi 04/01/2022 7:56 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
Thanks again. Your thoughts and info will help me grade other coins I have questions on.
Your info is appreciated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1406 Posts |
Luster is a little lacking. I like it at ms 65 but the damage in the reverse is questionable and the strike in the right wing is very weak.
Ms64 possible details
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
398 Posts |
Thanks captain! Your input is appreciated.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Sorry but I'm not liking the reverse . AU-58 . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Maybe 63. Obverse scratch from rim to mouth really detracts.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36744 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19152 Posts |
I'm at MS63. Appears to be a die crack along the 'edge' of the wing (left)? Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18663 Posts |
i can go with the MS63 crowd on this one
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,151 |
|