| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,323 |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
312 Posts |
Edited by HP2001PH 07/21/2022 3:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
Looks like a decent MS-64 to me.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1515 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
85(O) are average struck coins especially for the N.O. mint. the hair around the ear and slightly weak breast is typical.
the luster does appear broke across the cheek and normally I would not grade a coin like that greater than a 63. however in this case the reverse is quite nice, there are very few marks on the cheek and limited scuffs and marks in the fields so I agree with the rest at MS64
good job calling the grade on this one.
|
|
Valued Member
 Germany
312 Posts |
I bought this coin but will send it back. Coin did not match the pictures... Lets see how the seller reacts, but probably will avoid him in the future.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5674 Posts |
Looking at his other ebay listings, it looks like his photos are digitally manipulated. Can you post a picture of the coin you received?
|
|
Valued Member
 Germany
312 Posts |
Sure. I did not take the coin out of the plastic bag it came in though, so pics are not great. Main issues: Heavily damaged letters "ON" on the reverse. Coin rim hit on Liberty's chin.  
Edited by HP2001PH 07/23/2022 09:28 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5674 Posts |
Yeah, clearly not the same coin. He probably used a stock photo in his listing. Return for sure.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
i wouldnt use this seller in the future
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
Wow..this is so messed up!! I mean obviously his buyers are not checking their coins once received or he would have many bad reviews. Not even close to being the same coin. Wow...just wow.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,323 |
|