| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,080 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
612 Posts |
Well after that last 1880 that turned out to be worse than I or anyone here thought, (here's that post) http://goccf.com/t/428035 ......... and then got my money back and saw this one that I picked up for $17 less than I paid for the first one the same day my money was refunded. ($58 first one, $41 this one). So this is a new 1880 O ............ what's your opinion about condition and grade on this one? Thanks in advance! P.S. Haven't got around to it yet, but that little dark smudge on the eagles breast looks completely surface and will most likely come clean with a cue tip and a little acetone.   Edited by KauaiHawaiiGuy
08/04/2022 7:09 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
Au details
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1513 Posts |
 Looks cleaned from these images |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Pics too soft and dark to see surface details clearly.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
I'd say AU-55. I'm not convinced it's been cleaned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18668 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1513 Posts |
Looking at this again, not on my phone, I don't think the hairlines I saw were from a cleaning. I am at AU-55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
Yeah I'm at AU55 and it looks cleaned to me.
Edit: seen your other post just now about why people say its cleaned. The cheek scratches don't look natural to me, that's my only reasoning. I'm 50 50 on it anyway, doesn't seem to be evidence in the fields but the face is higher so hmmmm, I've seen coins details for less thats all.
Edited by TobyJ
08/05/2022 12:48 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Kauai, let me ask you a question. What caused the white spots or cloudiness on the cheek, neck and the star next to the date? The reverse has a similar cloudiness. Were these caused by circulation, dip or cleaning or is the coin original?
Edited by Slider23
08/05/2022 1:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
612 Posts |
Slider23 said .......... Quote:
Kauai, let me ask you a question. What caused the white spots or cloudiness on the cheek, neck and the star next to the date? The reverse has a similar cloudiness. Were these caused by circulation, dip or cleaning or is the coin original? There are no white spots, perhaps flare when I took the pictures outside yesterday. I'm looking at it right now with a 10X loupe and there's nothing there. I'll try and get some better pictures taken today and will add them to this post later. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18668 Posts |
i think the glare from lighting is altering what we see here. hopefully better photos will show the surfaces better
since the 80(O) are known for sharp strikes, the breasts and wings are pointing to circulation wear and not strike along with the broken luster on both sides. if the coin was cleaned I can only see a light dip and nothing that would details the coin
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,080 |
|
Posted 08/04/2022 8:49 pm
