| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 786 |
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24161 Posts |
Not my coin or my pics.... 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
883 Posts |
With what little I know about these; it looks legit to me. I was comparing it to an 1863 and noted the feathers differ as to where they point, most notably at the "M" in America but I did see some on ebay with similar alignment of the feathers as the one posted in this topic.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
Does not look genuine to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Overall color and detail are red flags, although I can't say it is 100% counterfeit. I would not feel comfortable purchasing this coin for myself.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2281 Posts |
That S looks wrong.
I vote Fake.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5671 Posts |
Not the sharpest pics, but I agree the S looks a little thick, and the date seems set too high. I lean towards counterfeit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Fat rounded letters and numbers, bottom of STATES mostly missing, broken bottom of E in STATES, top of R in AMERICA missing, large fat rotated mint mark looks added to a Philly die to me. I vote fake.
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
1380 Posts |
Mouth looks wrong to me, but I have zero confidence in saying yay or nay.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I'd say XF and questionable authenticity.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
My vote is not genuine
Mintmark should have tapered slender curves and double serifs, and it is tilted right, that's not the case on a genuine example (which has a slight left tilt) -- this is the most egregious reverse red flag
Left base of 1 in date should be directly over center of gap after 1st denticle below point of bust
Base of last 9 is too high compared to the adjacent 0 -- should be lower -- the center hole of the 9 is too small and the ball of the base of the 9 is too close to the lower curve (should be more open)
Curve of the mouth is wrong creating a wicked looking scowl/frown that is not consistent with a real example (to me this is the most egregious obverse red flag)
The weakness across from STAT and continuing into the headband is not something I have seen
I compared to EDS and LDS examples and cannot find a match for the broken lettering By way of comparison on an M-LDS example there are crumbling denticles at K2 on the obverse and two polished die gouges left of the O in OF
I have not personally seen a 1909-S with a rotated reverse die but one might exist.
Would strongly recommend authentication, but the overall look of this coin is just wrong.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18664 Posts |
dont even need to respond to this one. paralyse covered about everything wrong
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 786 |
|