Nobody fills holes in a 3cs collection.
You either have ONE - for a type collection (typically 1852 or 1851)
THREE - Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3
or
FOUR (add the Type 1 1851O)
If you are doing a date set, 1851, 1851O, 1852-->1863.
1864 --> 1872 and the proof-only 1873 are just too hard unless you plan to spend serious money, at which point an AG3 isn't it.
I've filled a couple of holes in my circulated XF set with impaired proofs or an AU53.
You either have ONE - for a type collection (typically 1852 or 1851)
THREE - Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3
or
FOUR (add the Type 1 1851O)
If you are doing a date set, 1851, 1851O, 1852-->1863.
1864 --> 1872 and the proof-only 1873 are just too hard unless you plan to spend serious money, at which point an AG3 isn't it.
I've filled a couple of holes in my circulated XF set with impaired proofs or an AU53.
1864 XF45 1865 missing 1866 AU53 <-- downgrade, someday 1867 PF58 <-- replace, someday 1868 XF Genuine <-- upgrade, someday 1869 XF45 1870 XF45 1871 XF45 1872 PF50 <-- replace, someday
-----Burton
Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973)
Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA
Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club
Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983)
Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/





















