1881 O Morgan Dollar You Vs NGC - Page 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 25 / Views: 2,449	Page: of 2

HP2001PH Valued Member Germany 312 Posts	Posted 09/10/2022 2:15 pm MS-64, maybe -65. Report this Post to the Staff
psuman08 Pillar of the Community United States 1773 Posts	Posted 09/10/2022 8:06 pm No way this is a 65. Price for 65 is 4X 64 price. I was going to say 64, but think the reverse may hold it to a 63. Report this Post to the Staff
TobyJ Pillar of the Community United Kingdom 1273 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:16 am Well it was graded MS65! Report this Post to the Staff
HP2001PH Valued Member Germany 312 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:21 am Ha! Report this Post to the Staff
Jakes Coins Pillar of the Community United States 735 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:23 am I dont agree and call "big dealer bias" I've been collecting for a couple years... Favorite Coin's are Standing Liberty quarters, Working on my type set \| Coffee, Corvettes, Coins & the CCF what could be better? Report this Post to the Staff
ericgreen Pillar of the Community United States 1512 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:25 am Not surprised at all. I have seen worse in a 65 holder. Report this Post to the Staff
TobyJ Pillar of the Community United Kingdom 1273 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:46 am Remember that we are grading from 2d photos and therefore can't see how light the contact marks really are. In my opinion, from the photos, I don't quite see it at MS65 but I think MS63 isn't right either. I think this should have been MS64+ . Report this Post to the Staff
Jakes Coins Pillar of the Community United States 735 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 11:53 am After looking at the new photo I am at ms64 as the marks look lighter than in the first set. Still dont agree with a 65 without seeing the coin in hand. I've been collecting for a couple years... Favorite Coin's are Standing Liberty quarters, Working on my type set \| Coffee, Corvettes, Coins & the CCF what could be better? Edited by Jakes Coins 09/13/2022 11:55 am Report this Post to the Staff
IndianGoldEagle Bedrock of the Community United States 36745 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 12:16 pm Quote: Remember that we are grading from 2d photos and therefore can't see how light the contact marks really are. So true. Photo lighting usually makes the marks look far worse than they are plus the photos blow the coin up to 20x or so. I think the TPG's use 10x glass for grading but not positive. Report this Post to the Staff
NumismaticsFTW Pillar of the Community United States 2281 Posts	Posted 09/13/2022 3:39 pm IGE- The TPG's don't use a 10x glass for grading. They grade it naked eye first, then IF needed, they use a 5x. Some of the best/top graders of all time only grade naked eye. Of course this doesn't apply when varieties, errors, problem coins are in play. You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Edited by NumismaticsFTW 09/13/2022 4:00 pm Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 25 / Views: 2,449	Page: of 2

First Page Last 15 Replies

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

View Last 100 New Topics

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change.