Surfaces don't look original to me. That reflective glossy appearance is indicative of a light dip or overuse of MS70, in my experience. I'll say AU(58) Details, cleaned.
@Ty2020b, this is the way it was when I got it. There is a lot of rub so I put it at AU58. I only use MS70 when the coin has surfaces such as the 1920-D that I posted. I use Conserv if the coin has some haze on it.
Misaligned die strike Uncirculated, MS63 There are two light scratches above and to the left of the date (1st photo) I think some of the field disturbances may be die polishing lines but I'm no expert on Buffs
Photos make it difficult to tell surface originality but reverse appearance concerns me slightly, especially around FIVE CENTS
@Ty2020b, It's in my album where most of them are. I think the only other ones I may slab are the 13-S T2 which I have, the 21-S and 24-S whenever I find them. They are tough to find with a full horn for a reasonable price. If ANACS has its' $10 special again, I may send some in.
jeez, I don't know. AU58 or MS64. comparing it to other higher end grades the fields below the buff do not appear original using these photos. so I'm at AU58 (details)
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use