| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,306 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Italy
1130 Posts |
Hello, I bought a collection today and found these two. Based on my limited understanding of ancients I believe they may be authentic specimens, but attribution and authentication help would be greatly appreciated... I also found the two coins below the roman coins... I'm at a loss on these. If the two roman coins are authentic examples, should I soak them to bring out some detail or leave them as is? Thank you all in advance... Best, R.       Edited by Roma2021 01/04/2023 2:03 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34393 Posts |
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Italy
1130 Posts |
Thanks @era and Spence. That should help me narrow it down... I'll post weights tomorrow, I left my scale at the shop!
@era, that's it.
@spence, the reverse is completely worn down on the fourth coin...I doubt I'll be able to attribute it.
Any ideas on the roman coins?
Thanks again.
Edited by Roma2021 01/04/2023 3:44 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
45 Posts |
Constantius II & Maximianus
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Italy
1130 Posts |
Thank you!! No reason to doubt authenticity, right? I still can't manage ancients, but each post and reply on this forum helps a lot! I bought them in this lot... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
I can see you will have a lot of fun going through that box, Roma.  I see no reason to doubt the authenticity of any of the coins.They look fine to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Italy
1130 Posts |
Hello, As I learn to attribute these a bit better on my own, I notice two or three points which maybe someone can help with. 1) My example of this coin does not have a mint mark, no XXI etc. on the reverse. Maximian, Concordia Militum: https://www.coincommunity.com/go/li....621?lang=en2) the Constantius II coin has a very silvery appearance, but it is listed as Bronze or Billion; if I had to choose which coin was bronze vs billion, I'd easily pick the Maximian not the Constantius; however, I do completely understand and match the attribution on this one . . . Any thoughts would be appreciated. I really value having this forum to discuss these things. Best, R.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
Quote: My example of this coin does not have a mint mark, no XXI etc. on the reverse True. It is apparently a "fraction", not an antoninianus: http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.....16b?lang=enThere you also have the Kε mintmark for Cyzicus, 5th officina. Quote: the Constantius II coin has a very silvery appearance, but it is listed as Bronze or Billion These coins contain a tiny amount of silver and they got a thin silver surface when issued to look better. Some of that surface may still be there (or someone might have tampered with the surface later to improve appearance).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Italy
1130 Posts |
Thanks @era...I take it these are both fairly common. A colleague is interested in them and I may move them along. I appreciate it!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
The Constantius II type is a common one, yes. Fractions (or post-reform radiates which is a more accuarate name) are actually not that common, the issues were much smaller than for antoniniani (I am learning about these coins as I type ...  ). Prices do not quite reflect that though - perhaps they are just not as attractive as their larger counterparts. Here is an example similar to yours: https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/ro...Default.aspx
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Italy
1130 Posts |
Thank you very much @era...you are a wonderful help.
I like the accessibility of these coins to collectors. Affordable is a positive. Prices interest me but only in a cursory way.
Thanks again.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,306 |
|