Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

William III Sixpence Billet Positions

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 628Next Topic  
Valued Member
Kipster's Avatar
United Kingdom
312 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2023  4:27 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Kipster to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Evening all,

General query here. I'm looking at some William III 1697 sixpences, but the position of the billets differs and wondered if this was common or an error.

The billet in question is the one by the highest upright paw of the Lion of Nassau. In several, the billet is positioned between this paw and the face of the Lion, whereas some have the top left billet at a 10 o'clock position between the two raised paws of the Lion.

Any suggestions?

Cheers

Pillar of the Community
Tom Goodheart's Avatar
United Kingdom
856 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2023  08:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tom Goodheart to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm guessing different dies will have different positions. I wouldn't particularly consider it an 'error' (unlike the legend variations or erroneous orientations of the shields to the reverse).

Huge quantities of coin had to be produced for the recoinage. There are bound to be some differences, some of which are 'recognised' as varieties in, say Spink COE, others aren't. Whether anyone has actually tried to categorise these (as has been done for say Victorian pennies where minor differences in which tooth a letter points to seem to elicit great excitement amongst collectors of the series) I don't know.
Valued Member
Kipster's Avatar
United Kingdom
312 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2023  10:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Kipster to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Tom,

I've checked in both but can't find any mention of them being displaced. Not to worry, just a general question really as a couple of the coins were of the same year and were in different places even though the same mint. I thought some may be showing wear, but they were clear enough upon closer inspection to see definitely not there.

All the best.
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 628Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums