Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1859 And 1911 Canada Large Cent - Off Weight. Errors? Brass? Help:)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,077Next Topic  
New Member

Canada
3 Posts
 Posted 05/10/2023  10:48 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Red33 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi everyone:)

I have two Canadian large cents that are both off weight..

1859: weighs 4.29 g - supposed to weigh 4.54
It is also a thinner planchet and the diameter seems to be slightly wider then my other large cents.


1911: weighs 5.09 - supposed to weigh 5.67.

The 1859 has a known rare brass variety that would also be under weight. I'm wondering if it's lighter weight could be due to age and wear - is it worth next steps and what I might they be? (I'm trying not to be excited at all)
Also wondering if it may have been flatted of stretched out somehow - making the planchet thinner and circumference slightly wider?

The 1911 - no clue. Can't find anything about it. It doesn't seem to be to worn or damaged all that much . it's significantly lighter than the cents from those years ?
What does/could it mean - someone on another sight said it wasn't authentic- and then later said it looks like a pattern coin. It's difficult to find any information other than what's available on coins Canada and Numista.
I was weighing all my large cents and they were all pretty spot on to their regular weight - this one also just felt a bit different in my hand.

Are they special in any way (other than to me haha)
Any advice / info would be helpful

1859-And-1911-Canada-Large-Cent---Off-Weight.-Errors?-Brass?-Help:
1859-And-1911-Canada-Large-Cent---Off-Weight.-Errors?-Brass?-Help:
1859-And-1911-Canada-Large-Cent---Off-Weight.-Errors?-Brass?-Help:
1859-And-1911-Canada-Large-Cent---Off-Weight.-Errors?-Brass?-Help:
1859-And-1911-Canada-Large-Cent---Off-Weight.-Errors?-Brass?-Help:
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
5585 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2023  07:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add okiecoiner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1858's and 1859's were about 1/3 thinner than those from '76 on. They were made the same diameter as the Brit 1/2 pence but thinner and lighter, so that 100 of them would equal 1 LB and each was 1 inch in dia ... both as a measuring device and counterweight. Your example is worn so it would weigh much less than when struck .... very common. It's not brass. The 1911 I have no clue what the weight difference is/was. They are very very common, so it's not a fake.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2023  08:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good info.



to the CCF!
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
New Member
Canada
3 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2023  12:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Red33 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the comments!

Well, I knew not to get my hopes up for the 1859:) neat regardless, tho.

Yeah - I don't know about the 1911 Numista note the coin weight as 5.67. I can't really find much els about what it could be.
It just doesn't seem to have the kind of wear to be off by that much.

Any suggestions or feed back on if I should indulge in further investigation for it - and/or where to start would be appreciated
Thanks again
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
5585 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2023  07:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add okiecoiner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well, since both of your readings were light, then maybe your scale is off. Since the 2011 is naturally heavier than the '59, maybe the percentage "off" just means more tenths off for the '11. Just take a recent coin, maybe a quarter from the last 4-5 years, and see what IT weighs and how far off you are from a newly minted coin. The '59 that you had was well-worn so it would be naturally lighter than as struck.
Edited by okiecoiner
05/12/2023 4:07 pm
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2023  12:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1859 is 5.5% off and the 1911 is 10.2% off. Just a point of reference, I don't know if it means anything.
New Member
Canada
3 Posts
 Posted 05/13/2023  2:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Red33 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, scale is off by .04
I was accounting for that, tho :-/
I have another 1911 - and the weight is pretty spot on in comparison.
The back of the coin is worn/ corroded - maybe I overlooked that and it is enough wear to be 10% off. & 🤷 #127996;

Thanks for all the help.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,077Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums