Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Shop CCF Members on eBay! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

ID Of 8 Reales Early 1600s Coin

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 1,204Next Topic  
Valued Member

Australia
136 Posts
 Posted 06/07/2023  03:10 am Show Profile   Check ClusterCoin's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add ClusterCoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi,

I have an 8 Reales early 1600s coin I would like confirmation of ID. I think it's a Bolivian 8 Reales, Philip III 1617-1618 KM#10, but obverse has some small differences (top right of coat has a different number of vertical lines)

ID-Of-8-Reales-Early-1600s-Coin
ID-Of-8-Reales-Early-1600s-Coin

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces75356.html

27.5 grams. Coin tests one position to the right of the brackets on my Sigma, 90% pre1900 setting.

Thank you


Pillar of the Community
mrwiskers's Avatar
United States
1780 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2023  4:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrwiskers to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe Potosi, PH II, Assayer 'B', 3rd period, 1581-1586 ... opinion only, could be wrong ... nice cob ... the difference concerning the lines could be from an uneven strike, common for this type of coin production ... looks genuinely struck, not cast from a mold ... suggest contacting Dan Sedwick (google for his website) & inquire about a certification ... most available 8 reales from early PH III era are from the Atocha shipwreck, therefore, corroded / saltwater-damaged, thus, if yours is 1616-1618, it is more desirable to the average collector (shipwreck collecting is another field, altogether...) ...
...Nice cob! ...
  Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 1,204Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to rattle this change. Forums