@Errers and Varietys Okay help me out with something then because there's not material taken away like normal Machine Doubling The doubling is wider than the original number seven and the doubling is very uneven around all numbers including the mint mark the mint mark does not have doubling on the bottom portion of it Machine Doubling is normally like a machine did it very precise and even including removing some of the material in the process this has no indications of any of that..
@John1 Why is it the doubling looks bubbled up instead of like a shelf and the edges and corners are rounded not indicative of a machine. Lines are very uneven thicker and thinner in different spots and no doubling on the lower part of the mint Mark. The doubling on the seven is wider than the number itself..
Quote: @John1 Why is it the doubling looks bubbled up instead of like a shelf and the edges and corners are rounded not indicative of a machine. Lines are very uneven thicker and thinner in different spots and no doubling on the lower part of the mint Mark. The doubling on the seven is wider than the number itself..
The devices have absolutely been reduced by this, so I don't know what you mean. I think you're just not looking carefully enough. Just classic MD with flat, shelf-like doubling, reduced devices, and affects both the date and mint mark, which a true doubled die would not.
Fresh Find, I have marked up Wexler's listing for WDDO-054. The hub doubling is not where you think it is. READ the description in the listing, it explains it very well but I have color coded it, so you can see the MD vs the hub doubling.
Whatever kind of doubling it is it's not material removed and shelf like you can see that it's bubbled and there's no thinning of the numbers or of the mint mark indicating material being removed from Machine Doubling and with Machine Doubling everything is even as far as the Machine Doubling goes whereas on the coin I have it's not even And I noticed I referenced the wrong wexler's doubled die. Which has very minor hub doubling and very obvious machine double due to the thinning of the letters caused by Machine Doubling as a result removing of material, in addition to the Machine Doubling removing the material evenly across each number due to the same exact movement across the coin that took place. Unless I'm missing something out of all the literature I've read and what people have said on here and CONECA
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use