Quote: All I have is a nickel with an unusually large 4, and I am curious to know if there is a reasonable conclusion we can reach about it
I said it up above and I'll say it again, the first 9 looks normal, the 4 is fat, and the second 9 fatter than the first, but not as fat as the 4. This tells me that the 4 and 9 took a hit and flattened them out - more so in the 4 then the second 9.
since hits happen routinely and can squash devices, I have to agree that's the most likely cause of the fat 4 and 9, other evidence of the hit could have been smoothed away by subsequent circulation
I think that smooshed, and then smoothed by circulation is the most sensible theory. Thanks for the ideas, guys.
The little window and thick stem on the 4 were interesting, though. That same phenomenon was also visible on 1949 5c WDDO-001. But the Class V pivot hub double was clearly visible on all four digits of 1949. That just doesn't line up with this particular nickel. A theory worth considering, even though we have ultimately discarded it.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use