Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2001-P Rhode Island Quarter - Reverse Looks Like A Proof - What Gives?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,287Next Topic  
Valued Member
mrak's Avatar
United States
99 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2023  8:52 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add mrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I am trying to figure what's going on this quarter. In short, it is a regular 2001P Rhode Island quarter but the reverse reflects light with the same intensity as a proof coin. I doubt the reverse is a proof, though it virtually indistinguishable from one, so what other things could be going on? The reverse itself is not polished, lots of cartwheel, so maybe an overly polished die could produce this effect? Perhaps it's an early die state coin? Asking for ideas/opinions. I happened to have an impaired 2001S proof so that is shown in pics for side by side comparison, as well a standard BU example.

Note the reflection patterns are very similar between the first two close-up pics (the coin in question vs. impaired proof).



2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
73900 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2023  10:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting. Maybe toning?
Errers and Varietys.
Valued Member
mrak's Avatar
United States
99 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2023  10:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No toning on any of these coins. I'll be the first to admit that my pics don't really represent very well. If the Philadelphia mint made proof coins I'd be inclined to think someone used a proof reverse die with a business obverse die but only SF has those dies so I don't really see how that situation would be possible here. Just trying to think of alternative explanations. Mainly want to toss this in a flip, but would prefer to have the label correct .... thus this post.
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 12/09/2023  11:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@mrak

Quote:
I'd be inclined to think someone used a proof reverse die with a business obverse die


For the quarters, the Dies are not so different. The differences consist in the degrees of the planchet polishing. I agrees that the Dies for proof are slight better polished and manufactured for vertical 2 strike presses and not for 850 coins minute as the horisontal presses for business..

Second, for this series only DCAM was involved so additional steps are done.

Many nice quarters look a little bit frose, but those coins never has this. This procedure is done by laser, and has nothing to do with the Die preparation, it is complete other step of the production line.

IMHO you has an quarter strike in the very begin of the Die life.
Valued Member
mrak's Avatar
United States
99 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2023  12:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
IMHO you has an quarter strike in the very begin of the Die life.


Yes, this is the direction I was leaning. Below is a picture of the obverse, which (in hand) looks just like a normal business strike. So we have a very regular looking obverse with a proof like looking reverse. Could something have happened to the reverse die that caused the mint to replace it with a new die so that the obverse and reverse dies were of different ages?
2001-P-Rhode-Island-Quarter---Reverse-Looks-Like-A-Proof---What-Gives?
Pillar of the Community
silviosi's Avatar
Canada
6244 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2023  12:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silviosi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The answer it is yes. The Dies life on 850 stroke a minute it is not long. The Hammer is suppose to go 100K but for Quarters never pass 80K coins. the anvil it is around 120 to 150K coins. After they are change. Took 3 minutes to change so for the Mint it is almost nothing. In fact each press work 45 min per hour, rest it is changes in the Dials and Dies. I prepare to post here an document with the photos and some permited specs of this new technology and the differences from the Mints (P,D,S).
Edited by silviosi
12/10/2023 12:36 am
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
95360 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2023  09:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is possible that the reverse die got damaged and was replaced and was mated to the first obverse die. This could show a huge difference in quality between the 2 faces of the coin.
Valued Member
mrak's Avatar
United States
99 Posts
 Posted 12/10/2023  2:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mrak to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Silviosi & Dearborn, thanks for your comments. Yes, suspect something happened like Dearborn's comment. Am very familiar with the appearance difference between uncirculated & proof coins. This one had me fooled until I flipped it over and saw it was from the Philadelphia mint! Maybe I'm just not familiar enough with the surface details produced from an essentially new die.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,287Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums