Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1966-D And 1967-D Jefferson Nickels

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 992Next Topic  
New Member

United States
1 Posts
 Posted 01/28/2024  11:42 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add papag1272 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I'm looking for a 1966D Jefferson nickel and a 1967D Jefferson nickel. Not sure if they even exist. I've looked all over and can't find them. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You in Advance. George

email removed
See Rules


Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6464 Posts
 Posted 01/28/2024  12:46 pm  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They don't exist. In order to discourage coin collectors and hoarding, the Mint stopped using mint marks from 1965-1967. Nickels were still produced in Denver during that time, but they simply didn't have mint marks, and are indistinguishable from a no-mint-mark Philadelphia coin of the same era.

The mint also stopped striking proof coins during that time, although they released Special Mint Set (SMS) coins with a nicer finish in special packaging.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  08:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
to the Community!

Your post was moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention.
New Member
United States
1 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  08:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add papag1272 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
WOW! Thanks for the reply! I have my father's collection and he has some Library of coins books with missing coins. I'm just trying to complete them. You just saved me a bunch of time. Thanks Again, George
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15395 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  12:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
to the CCF
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94932 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  5:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Brand is very correct on that.
I'll just add that the same applies to ALL denominations for those years. no mint marks from any of the 3 mints in order to prevent coin hoarding following the cessation of the silver produced coins.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
73760 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  10:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
They don't exist. In order to discourage coin collectors and hoarding, the Mint stopped using mint marks from 1965-1967. Nickels were still produced in Denver during that time, but they simply didn't have mint marks, and are indistinguishable from a no-mint-mark Philadelphia coin of the same era.

The mint also stopped striking proof coins during that time, although they released Special Mint Set (SMS) coins with a nicer finish in special packaging.


Learned something new today. Thank you Brandmeister.
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6464 Posts
 Posted 01/29/2024  10:58 pm  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Glad to be of service.

Dearborn brings up an interesting point. The Mint's concern was specifically around the silver to clad transition for dimes and quarters (and 90% to 40% silver for halves). Nickels were just a casualty of their strategy to discourage hoarding. I guess it would have been strange to remove mint marks on some denominations and not others.

I believe the Mint was still recovering from annoyance and somewhat unwarranted suspicion after the 1950-D nickel mania, where everybody and his mother was stashing rolls of 1950-D nickels. They still sell for silly prices compared to their rarity.
Pillar of the Community
kbbpll's Avatar
United States
4233 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2024  12:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kbbpll to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I never understood the logic behind not putting mint marks on 1965-1967 coins. Everybody knew 1964 and earlier was silver and the newer coins weren't. Why would a mint mark matter? I still get 1965 coins in change, especially quarters.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2024  10:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Why would a mint mark matter?
Because people collected one per mint, so three coins taken out of circulation per collector per year. Remove the mint mark and you reduced collector demand by two thirds.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6464 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2024  11:02 am  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1950-D nickel had nothing going for it beyond low mintage. People hoarded them aggressively.

The Mint had two problems in 1965. They wanted silver and clad to circulate side-by-side. It was probably already becoming apparent that many citizens were pulling every silver coin they could find due to climbing silver prices. If collectors started pulling all the 1965 clad coins as well, because they were a first year coin, that could cause a serious coinage shortage for dimes and quarters.

I think it's important to keep in mind that these situations could resemble bank runs and tulip manias. It doesn't take a huge reduction in the supply to spark a craze. The first day that people and businesses couldn't get coins at the bank counter to buy train tickets, groceries, and smokes from vending machines, that could trigger enough widespread hoarding to cause a real economic problem. Insufficient circulating currency is a bizarre phenomenon, and the Mint probably just wanted to reduce the hazard any way possible.

Also don't underestimate political pressure. There was some bad blood over the 1950-D fiasco. A Mint director who was asked about the dangers by Congress, and then didn't take every step to reduce the perceived danger (no matter how distant or silly), would lose their cushy job in a heartbeat.
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 992Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums