| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,062 |
|
New Member
United States
20 Posts |
Hello can any one tell me for what reason a coin, specifically a penny, a lincoln shield series 1c 2013 D would have another date and mint mark 5 years later than when it was minted?
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Hello can any one tell me for what reason a coin, specifically a penny, a lincoln shield series 1c 2013 D would have another date and mint mark 5 years later than when it was minted? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1780 Posts |
Hello, Unclefester &  to the Community! ... I like your ID ...  (Munster fan here) ... ...You've posted your question in the wrong forum, you'll neet to post here: http://goccf.com/f/5 ... ...Also, your pic is a bit blurry, & you'll need to post sharper focused pics ... also, along with good close ups, you'll need to post more pics of the entire coin, obverse & reverse ... ...there are tutorials here on what is accepted, & I apologize for complaining ...  ... ...this may seem a little laborious, but it's not really difficult, once you catch on ... ...what you are showing (on the penny) seems to have been done post-minting ( Post Mint Damage, or, PMD ), but I'm no expert here ... ...there's a lot of helpful, knowledgeable folks here willing to help ... again, WELCOME & look forward to your contributions ... John from Tennessee ...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
 to the Community! Your replies were split into their own topic and moved to the appropriate forum for the proper attention. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 Looks like a vise job to me, PMD not an error. John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94892 Posts |
 Can you post up a full coin image?  It looks like intentional damage by having another coin crushed against this one (Vise job).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73747 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1761 Posts |
 @Unclefester 
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
I was skeptical as well believing just about anything can be faked nowadays, until I couldn't find any type of tool mark or any real type of damage to the reverse image shouldn't that PMD leave some kind of scuff or do....something ? I just find it difficult to think that there would not be done kind of collateral damage to the image 
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Hypothetically if it were a genuine piece would it also be an elliptical? Idk it just doesn't look round to me at all... from one side. 
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Also if a coin has more than one type of error, be it machine error or DD or any kind of different error, what error family does the coin get placed in? Also it just occurred to me that if it was some PMD wouldnt it be over the mint image and not under it? Just a thought. And a thank you Mr whiskers and j from T for the directory assistance 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
I'm seeing damage on the Obverse photo. Likely crushed in a vise.
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
20 Posts |
Well shucks that is a let down it was graded ms 68 (by a coin app)( my town has 200 people so no actual appraiser close by)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
That coin is nowhere near MS68. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
 to the CCF and  vise job. As far as no reverse damage, it's damaged also. They may have used a piece of leather or something else to protect the reverse. One more thing, as stated above, not even close, if I were you I'd stop using that app.
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,062 |