| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 885 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1815 Posts |
Edited by Moniker
04/17/2024 11:54 am
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36558 Posts |
I think this one is a decent MS-63. Photos are not the best for seeing the surfaces clearly.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
1815 Posts |
Thank you both&  And aceton wont affect toning I have been told, maybe dipp it |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73688 Posts |
I'll say MS-62.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1755 Posts |
Too hard to tell with the images / toning. I'd guess MS-62 but it could be a slider.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
62 maybe 63, toning reminds me of an old ANACS soapbox
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Yup, old toning. MS63 IMO
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1509 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1815 Posts |
Yes it was sitting in this old holder when it arrived, Look 80s or something to me. Bullseye toning, electric or ice can't decide  Thank you all for your inputs sofar  Edited by Moniker
04/18/2024 02:28 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18638 Posts |
the lighting on the obv is weak and most likely hiding some issues there. the 87(P) are known for bold/sharp strikes so the reverse is showing quite a bit of wear. there a fingerprints on the reverse and I'm not a fan of toning when it has moved into the black arena.
AU53
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1815 Posts |
Quote:
the lighting on the obv is weak and most likely hiding some issues there. the 87(P) are known for bold/ Thank you Panzaldi, yes struggling with overcast. Hey its blue    Edited by Moniker
04/18/2024 08:29 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18638 Posts |
new photo is quite different. it looks a lot better than the original one
without a new reverse shot it looks AU58 or MS63. broken luster across the cheek. can you get a better shot of the reverse without that lighting. straight on no angle. the first rev photo is showing some light signs of wear so I'm not ready to call it either way
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1815 Posts |
Helpfull or to dark?  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18638 Posts |
rev photo way better. it is moving to the black side of the toning. some folks like that. I don't think it matters much to TPG's new photos new grade...MS62 with a shot at 63. you can see how much photo's matter. always shoot for those straight on shots eliminating glare so that the photos mimic, as close as possible, to what you see in hand. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Sweden
1815 Posts |
Thank you for feedback Panzaldi
I like the toning but its subjective.
it wont be sent to grading since its a common morgan, to expensive
Edited by Moniker
04/19/2024 8:37 pm
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 885 |
Posted 04/17/2024 1:47 pm
