| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 1,077 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
ICG Holder. I think they might have undergraded this one a bit.   Edited by fenton 05/28/2024 6:55 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2953 Posts |
Now that is a nice coin  As to estimated grade, I can put this at an easy 64, pushing 65 due to not many marks overall. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can you enlarge those images?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
450 Posts |
Couple cheek and field dings on obverse. Nice feather wing and breast details on reverse. Nice Strike. She might make 65. Agree, Nice Specimen.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Not a very sharp strike, but on balance, I'm at MS64.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
What is ICQ? Have not heard of that one. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
Sorry I meant ICG grading service. So it's a "buy the coin not the slab" situation for this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36688 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
361 Posts |
I like the color, that's fun. It's a weaker strike. All the hits on the face will keep it out of 64 range IMHO. I say MS63....and I agree, buy the coin not the holder.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73903 Posts |
I'll say MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Quote: So it's a "buy the coin not the slab" situation for this one. Not just that one all slabbed coins. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
To me it is a 64, I like the toning. That deep mark under the eye is unfortunate.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18649 Posts |
92(P) are typically weakly struck. I think this one is better than you normally see from that standpoint. the photos are not the best as they are a little small and the obv has some shadowing so it makes it difficult to see if the luster is broken. to me it looks that way. based on that I think its a MS63 coin. reverse is a little stronger so it could be close enough to a 64 but breaks in luster is going to hold it back. can only go by what the photos show
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1767 Posts |
Deep mark on the cheek holds this to a 63. Graded as a 62 would not surprise me. That is the prime focal area.
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 1,077 |