Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1954 S LWC W/ Possible D MM

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 909Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8775 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2024  8:05 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
There are a couple of 54-S dies with damage to this area of the 5. I'm wondering if one of those just a later die state of this die where the MM has worn such that it looks like damage instead of an underlying D mintmark.
Can you post them? I and sure others would like to compare.
-makecents-
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Yokozuna's Avatar
United States
4618 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2024  8:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Yokozuna to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@rmpsrpms

I'll redo the overlay with the OPs images. I did make sure that the magnification was correct by doing a straight overlay of the date and mint mark then adjusting the position of the D to match the possible mint mark under the 5.

I also want to check some of my error books. I seem to remember something about possible damage in that area, as you pointed out, I just haven't found it yet.

Edit: I did find a listing for a 1951-D with a D under the 5 in almost exactly the same position. It's in the CherryPickers' Guide Fifth Edition Volume 1 (page 120) FS-01-1951D-521 (021.51)
It's almost exactly the same positioning of the D under the 5 as coin rejector's 1954-S. This may be the coin that I was thinking of. I'll keep searching to see if I can find anything else.

It seems that the 1951-D coin has been delisted and deemed to be a die chip instead of an additional mint mark. Still searching for more on the 1954-S that coin rejector posted.


ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!!
1954-S-LWC-W/-Possible-D-MM


Edited by Yokozuna
06/08/2024 9:01 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Yokozuna's Avatar
United States
4618 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2024  8:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Yokozuna to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here an overlay using coin rejector's image. The lighting makes it harder to adjust the depth aspect of the mint mark, but it still seems to be a good match.

Back to the books to see if I can find anything on this.

1954-S-LWC-W/-Possible-D-MM
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!!
1954-S-LWC-W/-Possible-D-MM


Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96936 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6542 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2024  9:39 pm  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
An example of the coin that Yokozuna mentioned (1951-D/D 1¢ FS-521) can be found below on PCGS. I can see why they delisted it, because it sure does look like a die chip.

https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin...521-rd/37888
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 06/08/2024  10:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hmm, not so fast. I don't see a good match. I think the extra "D" is smaller than the 54-D, and you have the 54-D rotated too far CCW. Perhaps if you did the high points only again it might be closer to the right size. You mentioned an animation, and I think that might give more information.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
Pillar of the Community
United States
781 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2024  08:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add donnie59 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
96936 Posts
Pillar of the Community
United States
2860 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2024  12:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coin rejector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
coin rejector, this is very cool! Good luck on a possible new OMM, that would be fantastic!
.... Thank you makecents!


Quote:
Wow, that is a truly bizarre place to punch a mint mark! If that is indeed a D, then it would almost have to be intentionally tucked away behind the 5 like that. Great eye to spot that anomaly! =)
Thank you BM


Quote:
I'd be happy to work up an overlay.
Thank you Yokozuna for the help!


Quote:
looks good to me. an errant D MM over the date on a San Francisco minted coin.. Very nice!!!!
Thanks Dearborn, I'm hoping anyway.


Pillar of the Community
United States
2860 Posts
 Posted 06/09/2024  12:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coin rejector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I guess for now, I'll put this one in the "possibly" category. Maybe once tanman starts taking submissions again, I'll send it into him. Thanks everyone for the comments, most appreciated.
Edited by coin rejector
06/09/2024 12:38 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4038 Posts
 Posted 06/10/2024  11:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rmpsrpms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I went ahead and made an animated overlay of the mintmarks.

In first animation I highlighted the secondary MM in red, compared with the original. I then used the highlighted image with the 54-D mintmark to show the way the D may have been punched into the 5.

Overally I give this a 90% chance of being a DMM:
- much of the MM is missing due to being punched over the recess in the die due to the 5
- the small piece of the curve of the D happens where the die is just high enough to catch the edge of the MM punch, explaining why it is slightly smaller than the high points of the punch. The high points simply could not make contact with the die due to the recess due to the 5

There are 2 issues I see:
- the lower part of the MM with serif should show, but it could be explained if the D was punched at an angle. This is supported by a slight taper to the vertical part of the D
- the upper part of the curve should show more within the 5, but that part is shadowed so I can't analyze it.

@coin rejector, can you take another pic that shows the upper inside curve of the 5 to see if any more of the D can be seen?

1954-S-LWC-W/-Possible-D-MM


1954-S-LWC-W/-Possible-D-MM
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at:
http://macrocoins.com
  Previous TopicReplies: 26 / Views: 909Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums