| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 474 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
1952 D error Wheat cent. Too minor to be considered a Cud? One ( pic #1 ) or both ( pic #2 ) ? Let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Frank B.     |
|
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24154 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
451 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19148 Posts |
Die crack with a tiny associated die chip flirting with the rim. Looks cool.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
Hi, possible full blown Cud in a later die stage example of this coin. If the die was not pulled too early. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74016 Posts |
I'll consider that a Die Chip with a Die Crack.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8744 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts |
Hi, Wow cool. Thanks for that link. I have never found a full blown Cud. I always just look for doubling but I have recently started looking all over the coins for Cuds .I know to turn it over to see weakness on the opposite side of Cuds I wonder how many I have missed over the years? |
|
Moderator
United States
95644 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
95644 Posts |
Cuds will always involve the rim, This crack and chip does, but a Cud will also always be higher then the rim too because there would be no die to contain the metal.
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5193 Posts |
I have to agree with John1 , not a Cud |
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Quote:
I have to agree with John1 , not a CUD You don't have to but I am glad you did  John1  |
|
Moderator
United States
188213 Posts |
A nice crack example and a good looking cent overall. A keeper.  |
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 474 |
|
Posted 06/20/2024 8:26 pm
