Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop CCF Members on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Classic: What If? 1937-39 Arkansas-Robinson Coins - P / D / S Sets

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 689Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12250 Posts
 Posted 06/24/2024  3:04 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've posted in the past about how the Robinson Type of the Arkansas Statehood Centennial coin program came about via an amendment to the original Act that authorized the Arkansas Statehood Centennial Half Dollar. I've also discussed how Hattie Wyatt Caraway (D-AZ) attempted to amend the amendment to allow additional Robinson coins to be struck, to engage any/all US Mints and to remove the expiration date for Robinson coining authority. You can read about these topics here 1936 Arkansas Statehood Centennial / Joseph Robinson and here 1936 Arkansas Statehood Centennial, Robinson Variety, Additional Mintage

I wanted to return to the "amendment of the amendment" to more fully explore how the classic US commemorative coin series would likely have been altered if Caraway's Amendment had been successful.

Public Law 73-225, the original Act authorizing the Arkansas Statehood Centennial coin program included two key phrases: "at the mints of the United States" and "in such numbers, and at such times as they shall be requested." The two phrases enabled the sponsor - the Arkansas Honorary Centennial Celebration Commission - to create a multi-year coin program struck by the three US Mint facilities that were active at the time. The Arkansas coin program issued coins from 1935 through 1939, inclusive, with coins from Philadelphia, Denver and San Francisco produced each year.

In contrast, the Arkansas-Robinson Amendment Act included the phrases "at a mint" and "no coins shall be issued after the expiration of one year after the enactment of this Act." These phrases limited the approved Arkansas-Robinson coins to production at a single US Mint facility and restricted production to 1936 and 1937 (the Act was approved on June 26, 1936) but all coins were to be dated "1936" regardless of when struck per the legislation. A minimum of 25,000 and a maximum of 50,000 coins were authorized to be struck. (The Philadelphia Mint struck 25,250 coins (plus 15 for assay) in January 1937.)

The second attempt (introduced in May 1937) to amend the original Arkansas Statehood Centennial Coin Act looked to increase the number of potential Arkansas-Robinson coins by 25,000 vs. the first amendment - a requested increase of the maximum limit from 50,000 to 75,000 - as well as allow the coins to be struck "at the mints." The amendment also looked to remove the "1936" date requirement and the expiration date of coining authority. In essence, the language of the new amendment returned to what appeared in the original Act vs. just an update to the mintage limit of the Arkansas-Robinson Amendment Act.

So, had it been passed, it is very likely that the Arkansas-Robinson program would today include coins from 1936, 1937, 1938 and 1939 and that P/D/S sets would exist for 1937, 1938 and 1939. (Recall that Congress passed legislation to discontinue the issuing of commemorative coins from prior-approved coin programs in 1939). A potential nine more coins for the collector seeking a full date and mint set!

Personally, I'm glad the Robinson coin was a one-year type. I don't believe that the Arkansas Statehood Centennial merited two parallel, multi-year/multi-mint commemorative coin programs! Do you?

1936 Arkansas Statehood Centennial, Joseph T. Robinson Type Half Dollar
Commems-Collection-Classic:-What-If?-1937-39-Arkansas-Robinson-Coins---P-/-D-/-S-Sets Commems-Collection-Classic:-What-If?-1937-39-Arkansas-Robinson-Coins---P-/-D-/-S-Sets


For more of my stories about commemorative coins and medals, including more about the Arkansas-Robinson half dollar and its related ephemera, see: Commems Collection.



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
06/24/2024 3:07 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187446 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15381 Posts
 Posted 06/24/2024  3:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I don't believe that the Arkansas Statehood Centennial merited two parallel, multi-year/multi-mint commemorative coin programs! Do you?


Good grief - IMO it's bad enough that the Arkansas-Robinson was even conceived as a one year/one mint issue.

The celebration of Arkansas statehood centennial itself was not an event of national significance, and obtained a half dollar only due to the loose coin program approval climate during the 1930's commemorative craze era.

I shudder to think that contemporary collectors in the 1930's (and full set collectors today) would need to assemble a total of 10 Robinson halves!

One of these ugly ducklings is enough for me. Well, two actually if you count the MS and circulated examples.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 06/24/2024  4:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Certainly one of the less appealing designs in the series.
Valued Member
United States
98 Posts
 Posted 06/24/2024  5:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Worn Out to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting! This is something I was unaware of, so thank you commems for the research and informative post.
Definitely glad the Robinson was a one year type.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
hokiefan_82's Avatar
United States
3634 Posts
 Posted 06/25/2024  7:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hokiefan_82 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, commems. I'm an Arkansas native and now live there in retirement, but I definitely feel that the one-year Robinson commemorative was enough (and, in retrospect, maybe even that was one too many). I do think the Arkansas centennial celebration was a valid subject for a commemorative, but not for a multi-year program. Of course, I feel that none of the classic commemoratives were worthy of multi-year issues, but it does make building a complete set a bit more entertaining...
Member of SPMC, FCCB, ANA and ANS.
My U.S. Classic Commemorative Complete Set: https://www.NGCcoin.com/registry/co...sets/278741/
My U.S. Fractional Note Set: https://notes.www.collectors-societ...eSetID=34188
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12250 Posts
 Posted 06/27/2024  07:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
This is something I was unaware of...

I try to keep things "fresh" when I can!


Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12250 Posts
 Posted 06/27/2024  07:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Of course, I feel that none of the classic commemoratives were worthy of multi-year issues...

I agree! Pick a year to commemorate, celebrate it and then move on!


Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94636 Posts
 Posted 06/27/2024  08:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dearborn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yep, one year commemoratives is by far enough to celebrate the 'event' or whatever. producing multiple years is just a money grabbing event.
Pillar of the Community
Morgans Dad's Avatar
United States
5601 Posts
 Posted 06/29/2024  07:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Morgans Dad to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
" I agree! Pick a year to commemorate, celebrate it and then move on! "


Could Not Agree More...... The Reverse Design on This Commemorative, Classic........


PS, The 1936 Year Alone, Has a Unique Standing in Our American Coinage History., and Always Will.
Edited by Morgans Dad
06/29/2024 07:50 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 689Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums