| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,182 |
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. It's very important to have in the title. ***I have this 64 Quarter, that is super clean. Anybody got any ideas?  *** Moved by Staff moved to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6525 Posts |
 to the CCF Are you asking for a grade or what?
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
Think it would be worth getting it graded and the weight is 6.3
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6525 Posts |
A mod will move this to the grading forum for you. Hang tight
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 I moved your thread to the proper section of the forum. John1 
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19129 Posts |
I'm thinking high end AU--given the posted pics. As such, would't suggest submitting for grading.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9156 Posts |
I'm going MS62 not good enough for grading
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15396 Posts |
 to the CCF I'm thinking high AU based on the photos. Definitely not worth grading, the value in this coin is only the silver content.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18645 Posts |
 lightly circulated AU55 maybe AU58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73812 Posts |
 To CCF! I'll say AU.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Just looks like a bullion tracker.  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
OK appreciate it I will just put it in the spend pile thanks
|
|
Valued Member
United States
295 Posts |
I wouldn't spend that - it's worth about $6 in silver at today's prices. But not worth grading since mint state 1964's are very common.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18645 Posts |
 not a spender
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,182 |