Lightly dipped in the past, and might have garnered a straight grade, but there is evidence of residual dipping agent in the crevices on the reverse due to incomplete rinsing. So I'd say Unc details.
Doesn't look heavily dipped to me, but the reverse has definitely been mishandled. Those look more like fingerprint marks than textile marks. I'd put it 63 details/cleaned. It's not terrible looking, and would do better in an old Whitman album where the obverse is the focus and you can't see the reverse.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use