1996-P Lincoln Vice Pressed Or Error?

just a home made Hammer job, give away is the backwards lettering impressions on the original coin. Spend it.

I agree, PMD.

I know that 99.99999 percent of the time these are exactly what they seem, damage, but is this a possible early partial brockage?


ADDED: After thinking about it, a brockage would have blocked out the other devices that are showing through though.... I guess there is a reason that it's damage 99.99999 percent of the time.

I have a question for the mint error process experts out there.
Is the following scenario even possible? I don't know what to call it, say a "Clip Impression" or "Die-based vise job"?

1. Coin 1 gets minted.
2. Coin 1 is only partially ejected.
3. Coin 2 planchet inserted, coin 2 planchet overlaps coin 1.
4. Coin 2 is minted causing coin 1 to be clipped.

Result coin 2 with impression along overlap and coin 1 with clip.

The reason I am asking is that vise jobs tend to have pressure marks on the other side of the coin and this one doesn't.

One way to have that happen is if the 2 coins were squeezed together in the die during minting, then Coin 2 would get an impression and have no mark on the other side.

Here's some images to illustrate.
Clip image and image of ebay coin.
vise job showing damage from vice
Hammer job showing damage from hammer