| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,046 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts |
In this example a 1983 Roosevelt dime is the only coin that is not "S". 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
This reply was split into its own topic for the proper attention. Please keep the topics focused on one thing at a time. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95018 Posts |
I take it that the set in the image is not your set?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6464 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Quote: Buying one for $1000+ in the OGP seems like a big risk. The sold prices on PCGS are $4000+ for PF70, and less than $600 for PF69. If the owner really believed it would grade PF70, it would already be in a slab and offered at a few thousand bucks. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3535 Posts |
Quote: If the owner really believed it would grade PF70, it would already be in a slab and offered at a few thousand bucks. Totally Agree here. Good way to think about coins on ebay. If it is slabbed PCGS or NGC etc., as PF70 then ok you know it is a Proof 70, if not slabbed too much risk involved.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73798 Posts |
Good point, Brandmeister.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
399 Posts |
@Dearborn, that listing is not mine. I was making an example. San Fransisco added a Philadelphia coin in that set also.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
399 Posts |
By the way, I like the 1983 no-mint mark Lincoln Cent; especially the odd-looking one. Does anyone know how many 1983 no-mint marks were made?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Quote: San Fransisco added a Philadelphia coin in that set also. That is not the case with this. What happened is they forgot to apply the S mint mark to one particular proof die used to mint those dimes. That is, the coins were still minted in San Francisco, just without a mint mark. Quote: Does anyone know how many 1983 no-mint marks were made? Not sure, but you can assume it was just one die missing the mint mark and a proof die is used for around 3000 coins. This also assumes the die was not prematurely retired.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
399 Posts |
I assumed this mistake didn't happen in the Denver Mint facility? I did a bit of research on how Denver's uncirculated mint set and proof mint set coins were made. The Denver mint facility processes its coin-making; and makes its proof and uncirculated mint set packaging etc. According to the article, the "D" mint mark is their standard signature.
San Francisco Mint and Philadelphia are different stories.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,046 |
|