Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1983 Proof Roosevelt Dime No S?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,046Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
399 Posts
 Posted 10/22/2024  8:47 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Dough101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In this example a 1983 Roosevelt dime is the only coin that is not "S".
1983-Proof-Roosevelt-Dime-No-S?
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  09:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This reply was split into its own topic for the proper attention. Please keep the topics focused on one thing at a time.
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
95018 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6464 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  10:26 am  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Listing: https://www.ebay.com/itm/256682659969

PCGS 1983 No-S 10c page: https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin...s-dcam/95265

Apparently PCGS will also certify those as CPG FS-501.

Buying one for $1000+ in the OGP seems like a big risk. The sold prices on PCGS are $4000+ for PF70, and less than $600 for PF69. If the owner really believed it would grade PF70, it would already be in a slab and offered at a few thousand bucks.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  10:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Buying one for $1000+ in the OGP seems like a big risk. The sold prices on PCGS are $4000+ for PF70, and less than $600 for PF69. If the owner really believed it would grade PF70, it would already be in a slab and offered at a few thousand bucks.
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  11:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good call @Brand.
Pillar of the Community
Tacc's Avatar
United States
3535 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  12:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Tacc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If the owner really believed it would grade PF70, it would already be in a slab and offered at a few thousand bucks.

Totally Agree here.
Good way to think about coins on ebay. If it is slabbed PCGS or NGC etc., as PF70 then ok you know it is a Proof 70, if not slabbed too much risk involved.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
73798 Posts
 Posted 10/23/2024  12:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good point, Brandmeister.
Errers and Varietys.
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts
 Posted 10/24/2024  08:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dough101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Dearborn, that listing is not mine. I was making an example. San Fransisco added a Philadelphia coin in that set also.
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts
 Posted 10/24/2024  08:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dough101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
By the way, I like the 1983 no-mint mark Lincoln Cent; especially the odd-looking one. Does anyone know how many 1983 no-mint marks were made?
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 10/24/2024  10:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
San Fransisco added a Philadelphia coin in that set also.
That is not the case with this. What happened is they forgot to apply the S mint mark to one particular proof die used to mint those dimes. That is, the coins were still minted in San Francisco, just without a mint mark.

Quote:
Does anyone know how many 1983 no-mint marks were made?
Not sure, but you can assume it was just one die missing the mint mark and a proof die is used for around 3000 coins. This also assumes the die was not prematurely retired.
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts
 Posted 11/16/2024  3:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dough101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I assumed this mistake didn't happen in the Denver Mint facility? I did
a bit of research on how Denver's uncirculated mint set and proof mint set coins were made. The Denver mint facility processes its coin-making; and makes its proof and uncirculated mint set packaging etc. According to the article, the "D" mint mark is their standard signature.

San Francisco Mint and Philadelphia are different stories.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,046Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums