Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer FactoryPin — Custom challenge coins for military, police, and organizations. Global shipping, affordable prices, special discounts for service members!  300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Register Now! It's free!
Registering will remove the anchor ads and vignette (between pages) ads.

1984 Canadian 1 Cent - Near And Far Beads On The Reverse - Is It A New Variety

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 1,028Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  8:23 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Roll searching the 1984 Canadian 1 cents today and I had my eye out in these transition years and I can't find anything about the near and far beads Reverse for 1984. It happened on the Obverse for 1983s.Same 2 coins in the pictures, did this coin variety get over looked!!


Valued Member
Canada
262 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  8:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Canada67 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hmmm, interesting. Pictures of the entire reverse of both coins may be helpful.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  9:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Played a bit with the micro ruler to do a measurement.



Valued Member
Canada
262 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  9:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Canada67 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Measurements are similar, probably within tolerance when factoring in things like slight differences in planchets, well struck coins vs weak strikes, etc.
Just my opinion. Let's see what others think.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  9:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
These pictures I used the KG to keep square to the bead selected and I got a 22 for the close and a 30 for the far. These pictures were taken with no adjustment to the microscope and its an accurate comparison.

Valued Member
Canada
262 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2025  9:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Canada67 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:

These pictures I used the KG to keep square to the bead selected and I got a 22 for the close and a 30 for the far. These pictures were taken with no adjustment to the microscope and it's an accurate comparison.


The only thing is the 1984 pennies were not completely round, and if the collar die moved you might be measuring to a "corner" vs measuring to a "flat" side of the coin.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/19/2025  11:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You have to study were I got the 22 and 30, its the flat plane of the coin were the inner edge starts to rise up. I gave the science explanation with the ruler measurement. For me its a Yes!!
Edited by chadcoins
01/19/2025 11:44 am
Pillar of the Community
cownick's Avatar
Canada
665 Posts
 Posted 01/19/2025  1:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cownick to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That leads me to want to measure an 1983 to see what that was on both a near and then again on a far.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
162716 Posts
Valued Member
Canada
109 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2025  12:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add BCTokens to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I played around with your images and produced the following subtracted image:




The white areas are where the images are different. What I see is a white ring inside the rim which indicates that the face (flat part) of one die is wider than the other one. Otherwise the designs are virtually identical. This should be verified by measuring the coins in hand.

I don't know enough to say if this constitues a variety.

Jan
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2025  1:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Your over lap image is correct. Let me put this in a coin language.
- the bead diameter measures 10 increments
- the near is 22 increments = 2 Bead dia to the rim
- the far is 30 increments = 3 Bead dia to the rim
Agree is it enough for a designated variety. When I get arround to it I want to measure the 1983 and see how it compares.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2025  3:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The direction moving forward is for the Charlton to have a look at this near - far and if its a new variety by them.
Pillar of the Community
pennysaver's Avatar
Canada
937 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2025  5:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pennysaver to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Chad

I'm not sure if it's a variety or not, as it may be just the inner side of the rim on a slope vs going straight down. Saying that, I bought a pair of 1984's being sold as near/far about 15 years ago, but no-one seemed to know too much about them then, either. I asked around a bit and got a bunch of blank looks or "oh, you mean the 1983's", but that was it. Still, I've checked a good number of rolls since then and it seems to me that there is a difference, so I think you're on to something. It would be really cool if it turned out to be something recognized.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/20/2025  7:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I talked to a coin expert today and sent them some pictures. I will also be sending them physical coins to look at. I conversation the first place they will be looking at is the die, if it was the wrong die!! That makes senses.1983 the Obverse and 1984 the Reverse in the same time frame. They said it happened before. I'm seeing about a 60% to 40% ratio and not rare by no means just a variety. I do agree others have found this before and maybe chime in.
Pillar of the Community
chadcoins's Avatar
Canada
1134 Posts
 Posted 01/30/2025  10:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chadcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Got a response back from the Charlton Press.

Hello,
Thank for contacting us.
We appreciate you taking the time to bring this information to our attention.

Your email has been forwarded to the editor of the next issue.
Best regards,
Your Charlton Press team

514 954-3617 / 1 800 363-7082
www.charltonpress.com
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
162716 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 1,028Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums