Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. FactoryPin — Custom challenge coins for military, police, and organizations. Global shipping, affordable prices, special discounts for service members!  Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Register Now! It's free!

Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads and vignette (between pages) ads.

Commems Collection Classic: What If? 1876 Centennial Coinage

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 330Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
11344 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2025  08:07 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I previously posted about Director of the US Mint Henry Richard Linderman and his 1875 proprosal for a "Centennial Dollar." You can read it here: What If? 1876 Centennial Dollar. This time out, I'll explore a coin proposal introduced in the US Congress that would have created a pair of US Centennial commemorative coins.

In April 1876, William James O'Brien (D-MD) introduced a bill in the House of Representatives that called for the minting of a silver dollar and a silver half dollar to mark the US Centennial. The dollar coin was to weigh 25 grams, with the half dollar being struck to "proportionate" specifications. The specified weight was unusual, as the US Silver Dollar at the time - the Seated Liberty Dollar - weighed 26.73 grams. The Silver Dollar's weight appears to have been "reverse engineered" from the weight of the Half Dollar, as it had a weight of 12.5 grams in 1876.

The designs and inscriptions were to "be the same as those prescribed by law for the gold and silver coins of the United States," but were also to feature Dana Bickford's system of international coinage, and allow the words 'First Centennial of American Independence.'" Such specifications would likely have led to the use of Christian Gobrecht's Seated Liberty design on the obverse of the coins. Gobrecht was the US Mint's third Chief Engraver. (Note: Gobrecht served in the position from December 1840 until his death in July 1844.)

Dana Bickford was a private citizen/businessman of New York City. While traveling in Europe in 1873, he became frustrated by the myriad of currencies used across the various countries and the difficulties in proper conversions via currency exchange rates. This led to him developing a coin concept that included the proper conversions for major European currencies on the coin itself. He presented his idea to US Mint Director Linderman who liked the idea and had patterns made. Ultimately, with political and logistical issues arguing against it, the concept was not adopted and a limited number of pattern coins were the extent of its mintage.

Representative O'Reiley's bill appears to have been an attempt to revive Bickford's idea - if even just for a short time.

1874 Dana Bicford Pattern $10


1876 Seated Liberty Half Dollar


(Images Credit: PCGS CoinFacts.)

The coins were not described as "souvenir coins" or "commemorative coins" as later US commemorative coins would be, they were simply referred to as "Centennial coins."

The bill did not specify an exact mintage figure for either coin, but did indicate that their coinage authorization expired on December 31, 1876. Language in the bill does indicate that millions of coins were anticipated.

The bill was referred to the House Committee on Coinage, Weights, and Measures (temporarily referred to the House Committee of Ways and Means due to a clerical mistake). The Coinage Committee reported the bill adversely, which resulted in it being Laid on the Table with no further action taken on it.

And so, souvenir hunters and coin collectors would have to wait until 1926 for coins marking a milestone anniversary of US independence! Too bad!


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including other What If? stories, see: Commems Collection.





Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
05/12/2025 08:08 am
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
164037 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2025  09:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Weights and Measures, Ways and Means. I get the mistake!

Too bad this one never made it out. It could have been the King of Commemoratives.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
13668 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2025  2:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Excellent follow-up on the potential for an earlier 'commemorative' coin, although you state the bill did not use that language.

IMO it's a miss that the USA did not issue any official coins to commemorate the 100th anniversary.

I find the Bickford $10 pattern coin to be an interesting concept. It assumes of course relative stability in the respective exchange rates since it's not possible to readily change the values stated on the reverse.


Quote:
It could have been the King of Commemoratives.


We could have a health debate on which coin is the King of Commemoratives - but there is no doubt this would have been the First Commemorative.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Too many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time.
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
11344 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2025  5:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It could have been the King of Commemoratives.

I agree, a Centennial commemorative coin would have been quite special. I wouldn't have been in favor of a design that feature the Bickford currency converter, however. The coin was to honor American Independence - why have a design that focuses on foreign currencies?



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Edited by commems
05/12/2025 7:55 pm
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
hokiefan_82's Avatar
United States
3032 Posts
 Posted 05/12/2025  9:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add hokiefan_82 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very interesting topic, commems! Thanks for sharing.
My U.S. Classic Commemorative Complete Set: https://www.NGCcoin.com/registry/co...sets/278741/
My U.S. Fractional Note Set: https://notes.www.collectors-societ...eSetID=34188
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
164037 Posts
 Posted 05/13/2025  09:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I wouldn't have been in favor of a design that feature the Bickford currency converter, however. The coin was to honor American Independence - why have a design that focuses on foreign currencies?
I agree. Perhaps if someone had suggested that in committee, it would have survived?
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 330Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums