| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,214 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
06/03/2025 6:09 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
81 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you, moneymoai.  Grading coins can be tough. Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
06/04/2025 12:02 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2835 Posts |
Obverse looks higher than low AU but reverse looks XF, total net low AU-50/53.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you, coin rejector. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2333 Posts |
Quote:
Would this grade at EF? I'm kinda confused...?  It's a $2.20 coin (melt) does EF really matter on a 63-D rossie  couple of ryes in me...but come on...you have more credibility in your replies then posting this for a reply... Sorry...it was a bad day today...just looking for something cool...this just struck a nerve... still look fwd to your posts and replies... smat  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Smat45, I'm just asking what grade it would grade at. No need to be snarky. It's unnecessary. It's also a 1963 P, not a 1963 D. I still struggle sometimes grading coins. I know it's not worth much. I also know that it's not worth slabbing. I also said "Would this grade at EF" in my post, not in a reply. I also forgot to mention that this was a CoinStar find, so I didn't pay anything for it. Not trying to start trouble or anything. I apologize if I seem defensive. I just want to be respected. I hope you have a better day.  Errers and Varietys.
Edited by Errers and Varietys
06/04/2025 11:54 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19129 Posts |
Higher end XF works for me--drops below AU.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you ijn1944 for your comment. It's appreciated. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18645 Posts |
i have a challenge with these grading.
looks low AU. 50 or maybe 53. the eye appeal is not the best though
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you, panzaldi.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36678 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you, IGE. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15396 Posts |
I say XF45 range with splotchy toning that detracts from the eye appeal.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73844 Posts |
Thank you, nickelsearcher. Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6473 Posts |
I would say XF45, based on PhotoGrade. That reverse looks worn from many small dings. Also, the rims have taken some punishment.
I do agree that the obverse looks AU. That dirt or tarnish is distracting, I wonder if a hot water soak and then an acetone soak would remove some of the crud. I know we are supposed to ignore that when grading, but it makes my brain say that this coin was used roughly.
Caveat: I am no grading pro, and certainly not for dimes.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,214 |
Posted 06/04/2025 12:02 am
