Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

$5 Gold Liberty Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 2,459Next Topic  
New Member

United States
26 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2009  10:09 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add mlong219 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi All,

Can you tell me which of the following is the better coin, not sure how PCGS will grade these.


1. 1885-S $5 Liberty
$5-Gold-Liberty-Coins

2. 1897 $5 Liberty
$5-Gold-Liberty-Coins

3. 1899 $5 Liberty
$5-Gold-Liberty-Coins

4. 1900 $5 Liberty
$5-Gold-Liberty-Coins

5. 1903-S $5 Liberty
$5-Gold-Liberty-Coins

Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2009  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They all look to be in the AU range, but none of them stand out as exceptional since they all have a fair amound of nicks. It looks like the 1899 and 1903-s appear to have more complete luster in the fields(hard to tell again); so they may make AU-58, or possibly lower end mint state. Just a guess though, but that is a nice group of half eagles! :-)
Pillar of the Community
nod2003's Avatar
United States
3294 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2009  10:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nod2003 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not an expert on gold but wouldn't the rim ding on the 1900 be considered damage?
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2009  11:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Can you tell me which of the following is the better coin


Depends on how you define "better."

For me, the 1897 is easily the "best" in terms of eye appeal; it's almost completely free of the nicks which plague gold. On the other hand, it seems to show the most wear of the bunch.

Pillar of the Community
Jaobler's Avatar
United States
6381 Posts
 Posted 09/17/2009  12:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Based on these photos I'd go with the 1899. The dark spot on the rim might come off with an acetone soak.

My negative comments on the others:
1885-S: baggy, with lots of nicks on the date. Are you sure it's not an 1883-S? That is a low-mintage date, much scarcer than the 1885-S.
1897: small rim nick at 9:00 and soft hair details.
1900: baggy, with rim bruise at 9:00.
1903-S: noticeable marks on chin and baggy reverse. Looks like the 2nd-best of this lot.

I agree with Johnny these are all high AU to possible low MS coins. If the first is actually an 1883-S I'd take that one due to the low mintage (just 83,200 pieces).
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 2,459Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums