Posted 09/25/2009 08:09 am
The seller's response:
Thoughts?
Quote:
Hi Moe! Thanks for writing to express your concerns with the attribution of this coin. Everything you say about the O-104 vs. the O-105 is correct. I must admit that when you look at the reverse image in the listing, it appears the "I" is to the right of the "T", but it is in fact to the left. The other points to consider are that this coin DOES NOT have the triple milling segment at the leaves as does the O-105 and it DOES have the reverse die crack through the "50" that the O-105 does not. This coin is the O-104 R4+ variety; I'd guarantee that any major grading service (PCGS, NGC, ANACS) would attribute it as such. It does pay to check things on ebay carefully as many coins are misattributed - I even have coins in P*C*I and S*E*G*S holders with the wrong Overton variety listed. Thanks again for writing and happy hunting. Hope I can help you out at some point with needs in Bust Halves. They are neat coins to collect. Sincerely, Bob T BHNC #169
Hi Moe! Thanks for writing to express your concerns with the attribution of this coin. Everything you say about the O-104 vs. the O-105 is correct. I must admit that when you look at the reverse image in the listing, it appears the "I" is to the right of the "T", but it is in fact to the left. The other points to consider are that this coin DOES NOT have the triple milling segment at the leaves as does the O-105 and it DOES have the reverse die crack through the "50" that the O-105 does not. This coin is the O-104 R4+ variety; I'd guarantee that any major grading service (PCGS, NGC, ANACS) would attribute it as such. It does pay to check things on ebay carefully as many coins are misattributed - I even have coins in P*C*I and S*E*G*S holders with the wrong Overton variety listed. Thanks again for writing and happy hunting. Hope I can help you out at some point with needs in Bust Halves. They are neat coins to collect. Sincerely, Bob T BHNC #169
Thoughts?
)
Classy response too!
