You Vs PCGS/ 1900-O Morgan - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 13 / Views: 1,587
echizento Moderator United States 23731 Posts	Posted 12/03/2009 2:59 pm Report this Post to the Staff

nod2003 Pillar of the Community United States 3294 Posts	Posted 12/03/2009 3:07 pm I would say it looks 64 to me. Somewhat weak strike, but there is very clean fields which indicate there was no circulation. Report this Post to the Staff
busthalf Pillar of the Community United States 1304 Posts	Posted 12/03/2009 4:43 pm If clean fields mean weak strike then I agree MS-63 or MS-64 Report this Post to the Staff
BH1964 Bedrock of the Community United States 10982 Posts	Posted 12/03/2009 5:06 pm 64 with a weak obverse. ANA #R3154474 Report this Post to the Staff
murty Pillar of the Community United States 1353 Posts	Posted 12/03/2009 5:23 pm Ms-64 Report this Post to the Staff
echizento Moderator United States 23731 Posts	Posted 12/04/2009 10:50 am Report this Post to the Staff
otie79 New Member United States 14 Posts	Posted 12/09/2009 08:38 am You guys are tougher than PCGS. LOL Report this Post to the Staff
Moe145 Pillar of the Community United States 8904 Posts	Posted 12/09/2009 11:45 am Wow! Amazing coin, Echizento!! Well deserved of an MS-65. Thanks for sharing with us! BEAUTIFUL! Report this Post to the Staff
daviscfad Pillar of the Community United States 4541 Posts	Posted 12/10/2009 1:34 pm Nice coin. I was going to say Ms-63 64 Report this Post to the Staff
carlanddarla New Member United States 11 Posts	Posted 01/07/2010 4:39 pm I am no expert, but wouldn't the marks on the cheek and lack of strong hairlines distract from this coin? Just a question. Report this Post to the Staff
vermontensium Moderator United States 16677 Posts	Posted 01/07/2010 5:34 pm Overall, the fields are exceptionally clean, that's probably the reason PCGS called 65. I think the strike is stronger than the pics suggest. swcoin.ecrater.com Report this Post to the Staff
hemisboats Valued Member United States 461 Posts	Posted 01/07/2010 6:46 pm I was going to say 63 mainly because I thought I saw die cracks on the reverse. Could have just been the lighting. Also, is that a partial double stamped nine? Report this Post to the Staff
Bryan1315 Bedrock of the Community United States 14454 Posts	Posted 01/07/2010 8:08 pm Quote: I am no expert, but wouldn't the marks on the cheek and lack of strong hairlines distract from this coin? Just a question. New Orleans Morgans is notorious for weak strikes so one has to take that into consideration when grading O mintmark coins Report this Post to the Staff
arktekt3j New Member United States 26 Posts	Posted 01/07/2010 10:43 pm I started thinking 63. Moved to a 64. I guess PCGS thinks 65. I don't but for people who buy slabs the higher the number the better. Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 13 / Views: 1,587

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

View Last 100 Active Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change.