| Author |
Replies: 30 / Views: 4,255 |
|
Valued Member
Australia
432 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Philippines
1156 Posts |
I dont have the weege book, but offhand on the bidding, I find it odd there is no other detailed description of the coin in terms of weight, Au content etc. The bid price is also quite low
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2490 Posts |
I know this coin is wrong, but I just don't know why.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Hello, These are all opinions ONLY..without any justification.... it is just : oh, lets say something here... have any of you EVER seen this coin, NOT an Image... Coin in hand? IF not, what do you base your opinion on?  A forgery has certain recognizable marks. OR not...! But just to say it looks odd or does not look right is certainly NOT a justifiable opinion or reason to stamp it with the big F. Have any of you really read Volker's (Weege) books? Or have you just looked at the pictures? while it is true that the current price is a bit low, it could well happen seconds before the end to be close to correct. How many of you have actually hoped nobody else would bit on an expensive coin when you were the high bidder? it is also true that here are some forgeries known of this coins. BUT, if one apple in a sack is bad... does that mean all apples in that sack are bad? I am not looking for troubles here with any of you... but there has to be more then just to say: I agree!!! so what if it turns out to be real? will you all apologize to the seller for tarnishing his reputation? Perhaps he had NO idea, as happened to me when I re listed a German gold coin way back. it was a little known and extremely well made forgery which, interestingly, had been accepted many times by well known dealers and auctioneers as being AUTHENTIC. I was told and asked the question later by an expert:It is a shame, but do we really want to know after all these years and cause an uproar?  he told me that even the numismatic sections of large banks would confirm it as authentic.......plus others.. beats me... but perhaps has merit...  No hard feelings here please...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
I don't see anything wrong with forum members speculating about the authenticity of a coin. In the past I've used the opinions of members to help me decide if a coin was worth buying.
Now for the coin. I don't like the way that the die cracks run between the dentils on the obverse. Also, the dentils are't right. Between 4-5 o'clock on the reverse there is a dentil that appears to be even with the rim. Other dentils appear to be almost nonexistent and grainy. Finally, there are areas that appear to be tooled, like around Friedrick's nose. While I can't quote chapter and verse from any authoritative book, these reasons would be enough for me to avoid bidding on this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Quote: I don't see anything wrong with forum members speculating about the authenticity of a coin Snowman, unless one knows about a coin, absolutely sure, yes an opinion is great and very helpful. BUT just to guess about some, "whatever" on the coin because "it does not look right" is absolutely unfair and does NOT serve any possible buyer or seller, UNLESS you have very solid reasons. However, if it is YOUR coin, it is a different story to invite comments. I happen to be familiar with this coin ( not the one on ebay), and others , fakes and real. And NO, I will not go into any further discussions on it... UNLESS I have "coin in hand" and can compare to the real thing. But just to "speculate" that it might.....,serves NOBODY and is not a fair discussion. The coin posted sold for $407 which is about 50% of its Value in europe at auction. A great buy, because it is NOT a fake. I will post some pix soon, fake and real of other European gold coins... and I will invite facts and speculation then... maybe during the holidays.. No hard feelings my friend HHB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
I still don't get your beef with questioning the authenticity of a coin on ebay. It is something every buyer must weigh when deciding to bid on a coin. Is it nice to see the coin in-hand before purchase? Sure, but that is not the way the system works. Should it be taboo to talk about such things unless you already purchased the coin? Absolutely not.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1248 Posts |
Snowman.. I think you do not get it.... how would you like it if someone would suggest one of your listed coins, assuming you do have some listed, could be a fake...... NO foundation for it... just a hint, or a maybe.., without any further proof or just even a substantiated hint of a proof.
would you like it...? and NO, it was NOT my listing. the way the system is supposed to work is that everyone is FAIR...and objective. otherwise we loose the purpose... for me this is enough on this subject, as I do not need to continue with it. I am aware of the facts... Perhaps fairness and objectivity is not what is wanted here. HHB
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
432 Posts |
Well, as I said, I've looked at the Weege book, and for my eye that coin displays the same traits as the falsification in Weege - the weird shaped 'fringe' hair (whatever you want to call the hair right at the top of the forehead - hairline? etc) and an unusal shape to the back and base of the neck. By the way, the colour doesn't look right either... while I am not a collector of Gold coins (I wish I was ;), I have many friends who are, so I have seen a good number of Genuine and False German gold coins as scans and in the hand! Was hoping someone here had a Genuine example... Now, just to set hhbkiddo at ease, here is the entry in Weege:  As for questioing the Authenticity of a coin, I am all for it! If you're selling a premium coin (which this is; in that grade you're looking at something in the order of 700,- EUR) you should expect some form of questioning; particularly when its a one-year-only type which is KNOWN for falsifications! Plus you're selling it on ebay; why arent you selling via Künker or something? All things that HAS to make someone suspicious - I'm not even an 'Expert' and this felt sus to me straight away! If I produced something like this, I'd be getting it verified before I sold it; i) for peace of mind, ii) for the buyers piece of mind and iii) to increase its value!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
If the seller did not want the legitimacy of his coin called into question, then he should have done more to demonstrate its authenticity. He could have given a weight and diameter. He could have produced pictures of the rims. He could have made his previous listings open to future customers. If the coin is indeed authentic, then a lot of potential buyers passed up an outrageous bargain. I know for a fact that coin dealers dredge ebay for potential deals just like this auction presented. There has to be a reason that a potential 100% profit was passed up.
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
432 Posts |
Quote: A great buy, because it is NOT a fake. I'm not to sure on that - as I said, looking at the Weege book, it looks like the falsch! And now I have nother look, there is raised 'blob' on the base of the neck that looks like a die-fault... Two more images for comparision ->  
Edited by Zaggy 12/10/2009 08:47 am
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
432 Posts |
I've just actually noticed the 'creases' in the hair - on the 'questionable' coin, they match exactly with the falsch as displayed by Weege; whereas the original depicted by Weege is very different.
Does anyone else think the shape of the face/head in whole is different too?
Now after reading Snowman's thoughts too, I was drawn to the Denticals; he really has a point. Most noticable for me is the alder-seite, immediately above '1877' (and before any one points out the difference between the 7's, no need; I've seen genuine 1877 5M's with different 7's - dont ask why, but the 7's just seem to be different!).
Uneven wear; hard one to call as I do not know much about the hardness of Au/Cu in alloy in this ratio, but it is interesting that the points of wear are EXACTLY opposite on each face of the coin and do NOT seem to affect the Symbols adjacent to the wear (ie, look at 'MARK' and 'CHE' in Deutsches)...
I dont know, I dont have the coin in hard to weight, measure, test for conductivity/reflectivity and put under a microsope, but I hope the person who win's it is happy with it! I wouldnt be!
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
432 Posts |
Quote: how would you like it if someone would suggest one of your listed coins, assuming you do have some listed, could be a fake...... NO foundation for it... just a hint, or a maybe.., without any further proof or just even a substantiated hint of a proof. By the way, who was that directed at? I hope not at me, considering I cited the reference for my opinion in the initial post...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
You cited your reasons for questioning this one, and backed it up with some excellent documentation  Since I don't collect these, I went over to Heritage auctions and looked at a few. I do see the differences you point out. As a rule, whenever I see a raised mark on a coin that's not seen on certified coins, that raises flags. The mushy dentils and lumpy fields are also odd for a coin that is well-struck on examples I saw--valid grounds for discussion, imo.
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
432 Posts |
Quote: You cited your reasons for questioning this one, and backed it up with some excellent documentation I guess Uni and a few years of research have ingrained a few habits; such as, try not to ever go on the record without some sort of reference! You mentioned Heritage Auctions? Who are those guys and what is the site URL? I kind of collect those sorts of resources, where I can browse Auction histories and unique types. Cheers :)
|
| |
Replies: 30 / Views: 4,255 |