| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 3,038 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
I have recently obtaind an error dime that looks as if it never got a rim. it hass th full plaid layes intact, wheighs exactly the same as a normal dime, but the core is recesed about 1/2-1/3 millimeter. I cannot get a photo, but Id like to know if anybody has seen anything like this, as I cant find this error on-line. Edited by FYI 05/26/2006 12:29 am
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
177 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Hi FYI
working from a description is a little less than Ideal,sure you cant get a pic? ,,if I understand your post correctly , the copper layer is inset a bit from the clad layers ,is this correct ?
Rick
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
177 Posts |
exactly right, also , there is reeding on the clad, and the rim is not raised as much as it should be. I might be able to take a pic of this with my loupe showing it, but my camera is to stuffpy to do that on its own.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
I should have asked in the first post ,but you did not mention the date of the dime.
so the rims are there just minimal ? as compared to a same date dime ?
Rick
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
177 Posts |
the date of the dime is actualy higher than the rims it is from 1965. I have created a macro lens for my camera wiith loupe and tape, it works better than most ive used! so anyway, here are the pics Image: dime edge.jpg8.36 KB Image: dime obverse.jpg58.11 KB Image: dime reverse.jpg43.31 KB
Edited by FYI 05/27/2006 11:30 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
The dime has been subjected to an acid or similar chemical,, I had that in mind , but the pics confirm it .
Rick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Metalman
The dime has been subjected to an acid or similar chemical,, I had that in mind , but the pics confirm it .
Rick
Exactly where my mind was before seeing the images, then after seeing the images I was 100% sure of it.
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 3,038 |
|