Generally if these things looka little too wild to be true, they probably are. There are a couple of things that will tell you this cannot be 'true' if you know a little about the minting process:
1. Dies make thousands to hundreds of thousands of coins. If something like this were really out there (a 1983D cent with the mintmark ABOVE the date) it would likely be major news! There would also probably be a number of other similar examples for other issues out there as well. Since this isn't the case, it kind of isolates the issue to one coin, which cannot be something that's IN the die.
2. Because the mintmarks are placed into the die before the die begins striking coins, and each die is hand inspected by an official, a mintmark above the date would be quite obvious enough to notice. Furthermore, the mintmarks were placed into the dies carefully by hand by someone with quite a bit of experience doing it. Key word there is "carefully" - something like this would be WAY off the mark - too far, in fact, to be believable.
1. Dies make thousands to hundreds of thousands of coins. If something like this were really out there (a 1983D cent with the mintmark ABOVE the date) it would likely be major news! There would also probably be a number of other similar examples for other issues out there as well. Since this isn't the case, it kind of isolates the issue to one coin, which cannot be something that's IN the die.
2. Because the mintmarks are placed into the die before the die begins striking coins, and each die is hand inspected by an official, a mintmark above the date would be quite obvious enough to notice. Furthermore, the mintmarks were placed into the dies carefully by hand by someone with quite a bit of experience doing it. Key word there is "carefully" - something like this would be WAY off the mark - too far, in fact, to be believable.



















