Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1971-D Lincoln Memorial Cent RPM?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 3,011Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2010  12:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Im gonna have to let the experts or existing information make the final call on that. I have seen many split serifs like that that are not RPMs. I have seen some RPMs that have a split serif but also have other indicators/markers on the MM.

I'm looking at Variety Vistas mint mark style (MMS) page and the style for 1971 Denver was MMS 008. It's easy(?) for me to perceive the two split serifs occurred when the die was punched the first time because of the style of the MM.

To ramble on; I look for more than one style of marker (e.g. only split serif) to identify most RPMs...I hope to see more than the simple integrity of the MM compromised or in only one aspect or area of the MM.

You may sleep now.

Pillar of the Community
Scooby Due's Avatar
United States
4000 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2010  12:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Scooby Due to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
LOL - ironic that you mentioned variety vista. I was just there trying to match up which obv/rev combo I have on this coin. It is ODV-027, but the steps are too worn for me to determine if the reverse is RDV-002 or 8.
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2010  07:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Let's hypothesize and call the MM an east or west anomaly.

CONECA has only one RPM for that year that is not north/south

1971-D
RPM-005
Description:
D/D West (Replacement)
Grade: MS65
Rarity: Overall: URS-2
Mint State: URS-2
Markers: ODV-028 (re-engraved tie)
UVC-950
DMR-006
Stage A: Obverse and Reverse are EDS
Stage B: MDS (unconfirmed)
Stage C: LDS (unconfirmed)
Reported by: Eric Axtell

Ken Potter ( http://koinpro.tripod.com/ErrorVarietyList.htm )has none listed for 1971-D
Edited by j_h_s
04/15/2010 08:00 am
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/15/2010  4:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's a tilted RPM. A lot of minor ones may never get listed, but this one should be listed in my opinion.
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 04/16/2010  08:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
here is a hyperlink listing three tilted D/Ds.

http://www.conecaonline.org/content...9701979.html

  Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 3,011Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to rattle this change. Forums