Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Question About PCGS "Genuine" Coding

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,596Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
76 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2010  3:22 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add funcitypapa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
On coins that slab but are not graded by PCGS, I am used to seeing a numerical notation beofre the slash indicating the type of defect that made the coin non gradable. Occaisionally, however, instead of a number between 90 and 99 I see the letters, "GN". I cannot find any mention on the PCGS site as to what that refers to. Can anyone on the forum explain what this means? Thank you.
Valued Member
United States
76 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2010  5:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add funcitypapa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am assuming theat GN refers to the genuine category. The question is if PCGS can't denote the damage by one of their grading codes, why is the coin not graded. Either the defect can be listed or it can't---in my opinion.
Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 04/20/2010  6:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not sure, but I thought that PCGS at one point offered a service for authentication purposes only(before they used problem codes). Maybe GN just means genuine in this case if the submitter only cared about authentication.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187914 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2010  1:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am not sure why they would not include the code, but Johnny might be correct (it predates the use of the codes).

If anyone wants to know more about the codes, here are two previous posts regarding the PCGS genuine codes:

https://goccf.com/t/55240#434634

https://goccf.com/t/42535#336809

Here is the chart:

82 = Filed Rims
83 = Peeling Lamination
84 = Holed and Plugged
90 = Not Genuine
91 = Questionable Color
92 = Cleaning
93 = Planchet Flaw
94 = Altered Surfaces
95 = Scratch/Rim Dent
97 = Environmental Damage
98 = Damage
99 = PVC Residue

Pillar of the Community
steve199's Avatar
United States
1882 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2010  2:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add steve199 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Brad gave an answer last night:

https://goccf.com/t/63682
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187914 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2010  2:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A multi-forum cross post.

How did I miss that.

This thread is done.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,596Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to rattle this change. Forums