Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Population Reports Of Classic Coins

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,604Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
76 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2010  10:28 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add funcitypapa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Is it just me or are other members of this forum having a difficult time navigating Heritage, PCGS, NGC, and ANACS websites to determine the actual number of known examples of various classic coins.

From my perspective this is related to several factors:
A) the PCGS existing copies estimate seems to be a moving target. On the one hand this might be expected, but for coins that are over 200 years old, one might think that the known existing copies would be pretty well known. But in just the last week, the estimated number of 1804 bust dimes has more than tripled.
B) The heritage website of known certified copies does not include ANACS, which I think is a mistake. If you look at the ANACS population report on their website, they seem to have certified at least as many scarce issues either NGC or PCGS, whether because of their age or other.
C) The ANACS website population report is difficult to interpret because they will give a total for, using the 1804 dime as an example, but then subdivide into JR-1 and JR-2 subtypes but the subtotals are different than the combined totals.
D) One had no idea whether the population reports refer to newly submitted coins heretofore new to the marketplace and not previously slabbed or whether one coin is represented in all three population reports due to resubmission and crossover.

My take on this however, and based on experience with other collectibles is that there are actually a lot more pieces out there than the population reports suggest and my own rule of thumb is to multiply what I know by 3 or 4X to get a more accurate idea as to the true survival rate of these 18th and 19th century coins.
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2010  10:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Given the propensity of crackouts, I tend to use available information more as a gauge of relative rarity rather than specific numbers. Indeed, especially once the grade reaches condition-rarity level, I tend to assume the actual population is lower than the numbers represented because of multiple crackouts of a given example, in search of a higher grade.

For this reason, pretty much all TPG figures are moving targets.
Pillar of the Community
delaner's Avatar
United States
870 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2010  11:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add delaner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I tend to use available information more as a gauge of relative rarity


I think this is the trick - I was thinking about this the other day. It *can* give you an idea of how many may exist compared to others - but then you have to take into account that collectors tend to only submit coins that have value.

So yes, especially the less valuable coins (non-key G grades, for instance) - there are a ton not reported.
Valued Member
United States
76 Posts
 Posted 05/11/2010  11:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add funcitypapa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I thank SuperDave and Delaner for their responses. It is interesting to hear ideas from other collectors, particularly in this case because their viewpoints differ from mine because we are looking at the same data from opposite ends. The coins that I am looking at, like the 1802 or 1804 dime or quarter might be achieveable cost wise for a grade of say VG10 or less, but then the question is what universe am I going to have to choose from for those coins because the lower the grade, the less likely I would think that you could get a gradeable example. And then the question is for a relative rarity like them, is it better to get a "Genuine" or "Details" example or to leave the space blank. For these types of coins, I am not sure how many raw examples there are but I am in complete agreement that for more common coins, the bulk of lower grade (less than F12) are probably not counted in the population guides.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,604Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums