Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1859 1¢

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,511Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Prethen's Avatar
United States
3234 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2010  09:41 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Prethen to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This coin has a decent amount of luster, especially on the obverse. It also has an above average strike for the date...not the best...but much better than most 1859's you'll see.

1859-1¢ 1859-1¢
Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2010  10:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It looks a lot like my ex PCGS XF-45; so for that reason, I will give yours an XF-45. Here's mine:

1859-1¢

1859-1¢
Pillar of the Community
Prethen's Avatar
United States
3234 Posts
 Posted 05/20/2010  10:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Prethen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with your assessment about the level of detail. It looks like your obverse lettering has a bit more wear than mine, though. How much luster did you XF-45 have, because mine has quite a bit remaining?
Pillar of the Community
Prethen's Avatar
United States
3234 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2010  8:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Prethen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think this coin would easily grade AU50 if not a tad better. I had one heck of a time trying to photograph the true luster and color of this coin. I couldn't get the luster really in the above photograph.
Pillar of the Community
delaner's Avatar
United States
870 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2010  6:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add delaner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It looks like your obverse lettering has a bit more wear than mine, though.

Really? Your 1859 is worn pretty well at the top - Johnny's isn't. I was kinda thinking the other way around...
Pillar of the Community
steve199's Avatar
United States
1882 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2010  7:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add steve199 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Your 1859 is worn pretty well at the top


Are you talking about the 5? I don't think that is wear.
Pillar of the Community
delaner's Avatar
United States
870 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2010  7:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add delaner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ah! Yeah - that's a strike issue?
Rest in Peace
johnny54321's Avatar
United States
4849 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2010  7:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnny54321 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
At this level of detail, it is all about luster imo. I don't see really see luster on Prethren's coin from the pics, but if there is as much as he says, then he's probably right on his AU-50+ assessment. I'm just used to seeing a bit stronger diamonds at the AU range. There is very little luster, if any left on mine, so it probably has a slightly better strike to retain similar detail in spite of the luster being worn off. Nice coin Prethren!
Pillar of the Community
Prethen's Avatar
United States
3234 Posts
 Posted 05/27/2010  09:10 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Prethen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1859 issues are many times not well struck, especially the reverse. Mine is a slightly better strike than many I've seen. There's really not much wear on the coin. I suppose even with the amount of luster on the coin a firm like PCGS can be extremely conservative and still give it a 45, but I don't think it deserves that.
Pillar of the Community
busthalf's Avatar
United States
1304 Posts
 Posted 05/28/2010  2:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add busthalf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
XF details
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,511Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to rattle this change. Forums