| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 2,580 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
Is there anything to the second 8? Thanks   Edited by JimR
05/24/2010 2:49 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
Nice! It sure looks like it - I'll check Rick Snow's book when I get home around midnight and get back to you with the Snow number (if he describes it).
|
|
Valued Member
United States
376 Posts |
There's doubling on that second 8. I'm not sure what Snow # it is. Who knows it may not even have a Snow# yet. You can send it to Rick and for $4 plus shipping he'll check it out for you. Go to indiancent.com for the information on sending it to him.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
376 Posts |
I just checked the variety page at the FLY-IN CLUB and it could be a Snow 1 or Snow 7. Both of those varieties are described as having doubling on both of the eights so I'm not positive as to the exact variety.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1490 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
613 Posts |
Looks like it took a hit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
Yeah it may be a hit. I don't know IHC's very well. That's why I posted it. Maybe there is a match in Snows book. We will see. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
I just checked all the pictures in Rick Snow's book for the 1882, and yours is not depicted. I do agree with the post mint damage that's been suggested in the few recent posts. sorry!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
Sounds good and thanks for looking.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
376 Posts |
There are 2 different pics posted, one an 1899, the other an 1882. The 1899 looks like it's been hit and the 1882 has doubling on the 2nd 8. That doesn't look like post mint damage on the 1882. JMO
Edited by big777bill
05/23/2010 6:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
I am not sure what happened there. I am inquiring about the 1882 and the second 8. I have deleted the 1890 pic that was posted in error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
A close up of the date would help.
However, I believe it took a hit, also.
The S-1 has the first, and second "8's"south. 88/88s.
The S-7, is 88/88s
Yours if not a hit, would be 8/8w.
I just checked it with Zoom-Tech, and it IS a hit. sorry!
Dick
Edited by livingdinasaur
05/24/2010 4:56 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
Appears that is the verdict. If it doesn't show up in Snows book then it must be a hit. Thanks everyone for looking.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
is it just me or is dose the 2 look like it has slight doubling aswell?  |
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 2,580 |
|
Posted 05/21/2010 1:56 pm
