Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

What Happened To This Morgan?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,201Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts
 Posted 07/03/2010  10:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add zeewool to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I really don't know what the exact nomenclature of the PMD may have been. Probably would have had to have been there at the time of occurrence.

Planchet flaw would have filled in 'to a certain extent' in strike. The edges of the depression do not indicate flow.

The depth of this depression coupled with the fact that design is visible are the key. Strike thru would not have left the impression of the wreath, feather lines, and legs visible. (Strike thru 'anything' means that the 'anything' is between the planchet and the die). If an obstruction of this depth were to occur in strike, the only impression would be that of the obstruction, not the die design that never touched the planchet.
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts
 Posted 07/03/2010  11:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add zeewool to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I didn't see your post before I replied Conder:


Quote:

If the material is thin enough


You are absolutely correct.
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2010  08:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you, Conder...I'm sticking with strike error rather than PMD.
Edited by j_h_s
07/04/2010 08:35 am
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 07/04/2010  08:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Dcreek1968 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Don't believe it is post mint damage. The continuation of the strike through the "ditch" on the coin indicates to me that it is something that happened in the minting process perhaps from interference (something between the planchet and the die). So I would call it a strike error, but as to price.....the coin is obviously circulated, maybe a low EF. Not a key date so worth about $15-$20 wholesale, maybe. AS to the error, maybe add another $20-$25, but you'd have to be an error collector to really appreciate it. If the guy got $65, I'd say he did OK, but I would not pay that for it. Just my $.02. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, or in this case the "holder". Thanks for posting.
  Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 4,201Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums