| Author |
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,856 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I agree PCGS dropped the ball on this one. The 1916 diagnostics do not match with this one at all. I would think with a no date (even if they thought they saw the remnants of a 6 in the date) key date coin such as this should get a thorough look and go through a check list of diagnostics before it be deemed to be the key date coin that they think it is. its to bad the price is so high because if everyone knew this wasn't really a 1916 and the price stayed low someone could make quite a good profit off of PCGS on this one, but wouldn't be worth the hassle to pay full price for it then have to fuss and fight with PCGS for them to admit they made a huge mistake. Now I just have to hope the winner knows this coin isn't really what they claim it to be and returns it to PCGS for review instead of keeping it thinking they have a real 1916 coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1882 Posts |
I wonder why a link to that other forum would be disallowed...
Anyway, apparently Heritage is going to review the coin today.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
That shield is way too strong for a 1916 in that condition, in addition to the aforementioned diagnostics by the others already.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Quote: I wonder why a link to that other forum would be disallowed...
CU is a bit of a shark tank sometimes and their civility standards are significantly below the ones of this forum.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I just received this from heritage because I emailed them telling them about the problem Quote:Thanks for your advice about the Standing Liberty quarter in lot 24493, auction 210063. You are correct about the diagnostics belonging to the 1917. The coin was withdrawn from the auction for review. Thanks so much for your help in this matter and please contact us in the future if you have further questions. Best regards, David Stone
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1409 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
4849 Posts |
I got the same message from David Stone! Sweet! Way to go Heritage!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1534 Posts |
I agree, I'm glad Heritage pulled the auction. Mpst likely it'll go to PCGS for review now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4000 Posts |
Gotta be happy for the person that was about to get sucker-punched, and kudos to Heritage! Classy move.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
were there any bids on it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1055 Posts |
Nice move on Heritages part to remove the auction for investigation. It just proves that they are not immune to oversight just as PCGS is not, the graders are still human just like the rest of us. One more reason to buy the coin and not the slab (I know, I feel it has been said 1,000 times). Buyers knowledge is probably the best hedge against getting ripped off.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
Quote: were there any bids on it? yes it was up over $1200.00 and had a few days to go
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
Buy the coin, not the holder...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Again it's the CCF to the rescue! Just another day making the hobby good for us all! It makes me proud to be part of this site! I wonder how many bogus auctions CCF members have been able to stop? Nice job, everyone! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
it does not match the 1916 diagnostics.
|
| |
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,856 |