| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,012 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
It's amazing how you find this stuff Bob. Sure is good to have a guy like you around.  I would have never known. I am learning as I go about counterfeits and am hoping to learn more. The more you know the less you get ripped off.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
394 Posts |
Hi swamperbob, thanks for the heads-up..... But, I am not a Morgan collector and know very little about them. What are the clues that we should be looking for in this (I presume) bogus coin. thanks swamperbob
berry
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
BERRY4402 - I will start with one of the coins he posted - the 1885 CC dollar. http://cgi.ebay.com/NICE-1885-cc-MO...ly_W0QQitemZ190013655753If you were familiar with the Carson City Dollars of 1885 you would realize that the mint mark is simply wrong. But since you are not familiar with Morgans, look at the enlargement of the reverse at the lower right (the sixth position picture). Notice that on this coin there is a VERY clear indication of a "collar" seam. But that seam is an INCUSE line segment parallel to the edge of the coin. If the collar does actually show on a real strike it does not appear as an incuse circular line segment. In addition notice the portion of the arc below the letters LAR in DOLLAR. There is a pin head of RAISED metal in the groove that is NOT possible on a real coin and the arc itself is rather irregular. These are not features of real coins, but they happen ALL THE TIME on a die cast copy. The reason the line is there is to compensate for the shrinkage of the tranfer matrix after it hardens. The coins also show too many lines (die lines) they are faint but looking at the enlargement of the same picture notice there seem to be lines running parallel from the top left to the bottom right at a bit steaper than 45 degrees. I will bet those lines are actually part of the die. They are caused by the finishing of the forged die. I was also bothered by the loss of die detail on the coin. Is this attributable to a weak strike or a poor transfer process - I believe the latter. It is often very hard to get all the details from the host coin to transfer to the copy die. If you look at the enlarged pictures of the obverse there is a "fuzzy" outline to many of the features not seen on original die struck coins. Perhaps the host was pulled while the matrix was still soft causeing damage to the edges of the details. The yellow color of the toning and the streaks of light and dark are also typical of the results of artificial toning seen on many Chinese copies. Now - many of these features could and sometimes do appear on SOME real coins. Perhaps ONE or TWO of the features at a time. But SO MANY? On one coin? And all his other coins are rather similar looking. How many collectors of old coins have so many so similar looking rarities? Actually - everywhere I look on these coins I see things that don't look quite right. But the Spanish (actually Mexican 8Rs) are FAR worse than the Morgans. But then again, I collect 8Rs not Morgans.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
snowman - the dentil looks odd but I am not sure it is missing. It may be discolored or dented.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
So, basically, he messed up his auction by posting very good pictures? If you supersize his pictures everything can be seen that you pointed out. This is a good way to learn, I am going to be looking at more of your posts on counterfeits in the future.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
Irishraider - you are right. The good scans do expose the forgery. It also gives him a reason to keep your money because the fraud should have been totally obvious if you followed his directions. So when the fellow said to "LOOK CAREFULLY" I did. You can learn a lot from the scans if you look more at how something is made than at the picture it shows. The designs will usually be fairly correct because they produce these counterfeits with transfer dies made from real coins.
When these coins are posted with less detail - I will always ask for enlargements. If they say they can't do it - I will quite often tell the seller that I am only interested in bidding on counterfeits. It at times improves their scans.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
One other thing to tell you it is a fraudulent seller. Go look at the feedback, it was all from one guy, who, by the way has changed his ebay ID within the last month or so. Guess what the old ID was? liuzhengan487 Do the first three letters look familiar? MM [:0]
|
|
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts |
Thanks for the education, swamperbob! I would never bid on a morgan requiring $15.00 S/H + $3.00 insurance anyway.  Probably shipping from China! And yeah, morganman- looks like he already has a couple of shill accounts set up. Sad. Regards, ~neuron
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1840 Posts |
Thanks for the info. Some day I'll be able to spot a fake by something besides the country it's coming from.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1267 Posts |
If you get a chance to lay your hand on some or even one check the rim/lip of the coin, it's abnormally raised on both sides of the coin. I've got 17 of these fakes and even got a refund from Paypal to boot :)
Ben
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Is it just me, or is the third digit on the date of each coin, even the Spanish ones, wrong?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5362 Posts |
I had not compared the digits on all the dates but most of the third digits are incorrect - one of the closest is the 1750 Mexican coin. But there are a bunch of other numerals that have problems as well.
I see that he is getting more bids. Too bad, but they have enough information in the pictures if they do choose to look.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,012 |
|