Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Lens For Canon T2i

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 3,655Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
lukkyseven's Avatar
United States
880 Posts
 Posted 11/25/2010  9:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add lukkyseven to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think I'll probably go with the Tamron over the canon after seeing an extensive side by side comparison (and for my purposes it'd be great).

Now that I'm home that picture looks pretty darn good to me :). I'll look into some macro filters - they might end up working well for me also. And for a few dollars I may really have to consider it. That way I can end up getting a different lense.
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 11/25/2010  10:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I won't disagree with Stunet's opinion of macro add-ons, even though my personal opinion is negative, because he's demonstrated his skill with them and they work well indeed in his hands. Raynox is one brand which I've seen decent results from, kicking around the Internet. Their stuff isn't a whole lot cheaper than a dedicated lens. Other add-on Macros, I don't know enough about to form an opinion.

If you end up saving the money for a second lens, permit me to recommend the Canon 55-250. I's the perfect addition to the 18-55 and far better than a lens of this price ($200-ish) has any right to be.
Previously Banned Member
EyeEatWheaties's Avatar
United States
71 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2010  01:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add EyeEatWheaties to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
hmmmmmm.... is there a point of diminishing return of "you get what you paid for"? Is bigger better?

I have been building a Canon 40D Setup dedicated to coins for the last 6 months. learning all the various related coin photography I can..... Now, after experimenting with different lens, lighting, software.. I now feel like I can go ahead and spend the $$ for a true macro lens.... Rather that the adapted "really old" 35-70mm Nikor lens with extension tubes.. it does well however, the DOF is too sensitive and I would like auto focus from the computer..

Anyways, I was sold on the 60mm, then I saw rave reviews for the 100mm, then... someone was claiming delivery of a 150mm any day now.. I think he mentioned he would have gone to the 180mm except it was twice the price of the 150mm he was getting.

Started shopping the 180mm, at $700 lightly used and $500 for the the 150mm I am struggling. I guess at that length either will work perfectly for coins? I am inclined to spend the extra money for the longer lens. Bigger is better, right?

I am comparing these 2:

Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM for Canon and Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM Lens - LNIB
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2010  03:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Bigger is better, right?


Not for coins. You end up having to put the coin on one side of the room, and the camera on the other.

Seriously, with the coin at desk height, I have to mount my 450D/100mm Macro so high that the LCD and viewfinder are unusable; I can't reach them. It's no big thing because I shoot remotely from the computer, but someone who didn't do it that way would find it an annoyance.

At 150 or 180mm, you would probably need 24"+ from the end of the lens to the coin. Camera on tripod, coin on floor.
Previously Banned Member
EyeEatWheaties's Avatar
United States
71 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2010  03:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add EyeEatWheaties to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I use a tethered live view for my shots - my eye sight is shot. those little LCD's are worthless as are the viewfinder - 24" sounds about right for where I feel that I can get the best lighting. I am at about 6" above the coin now. I worry I am going to melt the camera with the lights!

Also, more info.... I have been manually focusing the lens and then use my ethnically rigged stand to crank the coin into focus while observing on the monitor. I should add that I only shoot copper. oh wait.... a pic is worth a thousand words....

Lens-For-Canon-T2i


I am leaning towards the 150mm - 180 just seems obscenely large! :)





  Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 3,655Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums