Grade A Couple Morgans - Coin Community Forum

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Author	Replies: 11 / Views: 1,442
stumpy041486 Valued Member United States 139 Posts	Posted 12/01/2010 4:16 pm What do you think of these? These are either not graded or in a slab that isn't PCGS, NGC, or ANACS. Any worth getting graded? Thanks Report this Post to the Staff

fenton Pillar of the Community United States 4989 Posts	Posted 12/01/2010 4:40 pm All appear to be Choice BU or better Morgans I would rate the 1902-S and 1885-O at MS-63, the 1900-O at MS-65, and the 1881-S at MS-66. Report this Post to the Staff
BH1964 Bedrock of the Community United States 10982 Posts	Posted 12/01/2010 5:01 pm 1902-S: MS62 1885-O: MS63 1900-O: MS64+ 1881-S: MS65 ANA #R3154474 Report this Post to the Staff
fenton Pillar of the Community United States 4989 Posts	Posted 12/01/2010 5:16 pm If I didn't mention it, your 1900-O and 1881-S are gorgeous great examples of Gem (or very near) Morgans. Report this Post to the Staff
mattbrowning7 Valued Member United States 321 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 09:42 am 1902-S: 63 1885-O: 63 1900-O: 65 1881-S: hard to say. the cheek is a bit dark but I'm guessing its 65 Thanks for sharing! Report this Post to the Staff
fenton Pillar of the Community United States 4989 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 10:06 am Strike on that 81s is just hammered Report this Post to the Staff
nolawyer Pillar of the Community United States 763 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 3:34 pm I would say : 1902-S MS62 1885-O I don't know if it is the photos, but it looks cleaned to me. 1900-O MS65 1881-S MS66 Report this Post to the Staff
mattbrowning7 Valued Member United States 321 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 7:12 pm Oh ya! I wanted to mention, the 85 O looks goofy. I think it spent time with some PVC or was chemically cleaned with the wrong stuff. Definitely looks like chemicals were involved though IMO. Report this Post to the Staff
kelanies Valued Member United States 56 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 7:32 pm 1902 S: ms63 1885 O: ms63 looks semi proof like 1900 O: ms64 nice coin but was dipped, will get bagged unless dipped better 1881 S: very hard to tell, but there appear to be denticle marks in the field. The cheek is beautiful though. MS64-ms66 Report this Post to the Staff
wheatguy Pillar of the Community United States 1534 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 9:11 pm Quote: I wanted to mention, the 85 O looks goofy. I think it spent time with some PVC or was chemically cleaned with the wrong stuff. It looks fine to me, possibly a side effect of the images. It looks to have a fair amount of luster from the images, and I've seen several 85-O's that had a look similar to that, including one I used to own. Report this Post to the Staff
mattbrowning7 Valued Member United States 321 Posts	Posted 12/04/2010 11:38 pm Thanks for the response wheatguy. I'll trust your judgment here, I'm still fairly new to the game. Report this Post to the Staff
thecoinczar Valued Member United States 455 Posts	Posted 12/05/2010 11:16 pm 1. = MS63 2. = MS63 3. = MS64 4. = MS64 Report this Post to the Staff
	Replies: 11 / Views: 1,442

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

All Forums Category: US Coins and Currency Forums Forum: US Classic and Colonial Coin Grading

The First Dollar, your premier source for bullion and rare coins. See our bullion list on the site and the coin inventory on ebay.

Silver Gold Bull US is the United States leading bullion dealer. We deliver gold coins, gold bars, silver coins, silver bars and precious metals to your door. Order today!

View Last 100 New Topics

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum

It took 0.43 seconds to rattle this change.