| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,520 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
183 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
The coin pictured does not appear to be authentic. Sorry. (Genuine on top yours below): 
Edited by fenton 12/22/2010 2:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Fenton would you mind going into a bit of detail on why you believe this coin is not authentic. I like the pic comparison but would like to hear an explanation.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
183 Posts |
Thanks for the reply but I too would like some details to understand better.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
If it's a fake it looks like a good one. I guess the denticles look a bit long and narrow compared to many Morgan dollars, but the date numerals and stars don't look obviously misshapen to me. Some star points do look sharper than the posted original coin. Might these differences exist because the coins are different VAMs? Gradewise this is about VF-35 IMO. You could just soak it in water for awhile and then rinse, without any rubbing or poking. Maybe some dirt would come off. To me the color suggests someone may already have tried to clean it. If genuine it is worth maybe $125. It might not be worth putting another $30 or so into having it graded by PCGS although that would answer the authenticity question. I have an 1890-CC certified by PCGS. Here's the date area of my coin, in case another reference would be useful. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
183 Posts |
This is my first Morgan purchase -- 11 in total from a guy off Craigslist. If the 1890 CC is of questionable authenticity, then I may question some of the others. Any other opinions? I can upload photos of the others too if needed.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote: Just rescued this coin from some "junk" silver...does anyone think this coin should be sent to PCGS?...easily come off with a dry cuetip -- should I just leave it as is or try something?
Nice junk silver find! Looks VF and worth about $100 so I would not have it graded unless you're adding it to a membership voucher to fill an order and maybe a free quarterly special. Do not touch it with a dry Q-Tip. Best bet is to leave it alone if you don't have experience with silver conservation. Looks good the way it is to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Yeah on second look I think it is probably genuine. False alarm!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
Well the second "C" definitely resembles a VAM 2, but I can't find anything on the variable denticles or misshapen stars. What ever you have, it's a keeper. I can't believe you found it in a junk silver box.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
183 Posts |
Thanks everyone for the help! Although I am afraid I may get more hooked on collecting the more I learn...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I'm starting to think this one is better grade but just very weakly struck and possibly exposed to some strange environmental conditions. The VF type coins usually lack those sharp edges on the stars and also show way more wear on the cheek, cap, and other areas. That's one of the reasons I thought it was fake - it almost looks like one of those coins that gets terribly struck in the middle, sharp on the edges, and is then "dirtied up" to look old. That said, I've never seen a fake 90-CC with details this good usually the date and mint mark are totally botched but this one matches, very well, some of the examples.
So I'm a hair perplexed on this one. Where's the SuperDave when you need him? :)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
183 Posts |
Just visited my grandfather yesterday and turns out he has 2 Morgans. 1 of them is an 1890 CC in condition a little worse than the coin I posted above. I may get a photo of it sometime for comparison. He also has some nice half dollars I'd like to borrow for some photos (1832 in VF?, 1812 in VG?, 1877 in G?). If I get the photos I'll upload in their own threads later...
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,520 |
|